arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.08792math.STstat.TH
收藏

零假设下局部错误发现率的解释

Interpretation of local false discovery rates under the zero assumption

Daniel Xiang, Nikolaos Ignatiadis, Peter McCullagh

AI总结:

本文澄清了零密度假设下局部错误发现率的含义,指出其估计的是互补局部活动率而非零信号率,并证明该量具有弱连续性与支配性。

摘要:

在具有平行信号加噪声观测的大规模研究中,局部错误发现率是一个汇总统计量,通常被认为等于信号为原假设的后验概率。我们更倾向于将后者称为局部零信号率,以强调我们的观点:零信号和错误发现并非同一事件。局部零信号率通常通过经验贝叶斯程序进行估计,这些程序基于“零密度假设”,该假设将接近零的观测密度完全归因于零信号。在本文中,我们认为这种策略并不能提供局部零信号率的估计,而是提供了一种我们称之为互补局部活动率(clar)的量的估计。尽管不活跃的信号可能很小,但它不一定为零。clar 同时支配局部零信号率和局部错误符号率,并且是信号分布的弱连续泛函。因此,当信号稀疏但不完全为零时,clar 取合理值。我们的发现阐明了在零密度假设下估计的局部错误发现率的解释。

英文摘要:

In large-scale studies with parallel signal-plus-noise observations, the local false discovery rate is a summary statistic that is often presumed to be equal to the posterior probability that the signal is null. We prefer to call the latter quantity the local null-signal rate to emphasize our view that a null signal and a false discovery are not identical events. The local null-signal rate is commonly estimated through empirical Bayes procedures that build on the `zero density assumption,' which attributes the density of observations near zero entirely to null signals. In this paper, we argue that this strategy does not furnish estimates of the local null-signal rate, but instead of a quantity we call the complementary local activity rate (clar). Although it is likely to be small, an inactive signal is not necessarily zero. The clar dominates both the local null-signal rate and the local false sign rate and is a weakly continuous functional of the signal distribution. As a consequence, it takes on sensible values when the signal is sparse but not exactly zero. Our findings clarify the interpretation of local false discovery rates estimated under the zero density assumption.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑