arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.08320cs.CV

运动的悖论:基于骨架的步态识别模型中虚假相关性的证据

The Paradox of Motion: Evidence for Spurious Correlations in Skeleton-based Gait Recognition Models

POLITEHNICA Bucharest(布加勒斯特理工大学);Faculty of Automatic Control and Computer Science(自动控制与计算机科学学院)

Andy Cătrună, Adrian Cosma, Emilian Rădoi

AI总结:

本研究揭示了基于骨架的步态识别模型过度依赖隐式人体测量信息而非运动模式的虚假相关性,通过去除身高信息导致性能下降及仅处理单帧姿态的空间变换器模型取得高准确率实验,强调需重新评估方法学假设并构建更多样化的大规模数据集。

摘要:

步态作为一种隐蔽的生物特征,因其能够在远距离、跨越外部着装和环境条件识别个体而受到重视。本研究挑战了普遍假设,即基于视觉的步态识别,特别是基于骨架的步态识别,主要依赖运动模式,揭示了编码在行走序列中的隐式人体测量信息的重要作用。我们通过对比分析表明,去除身高信息会导致三个模型和两个基准(CASIA-B和GREW)的性能显著下降。此外,我们提出了一种处理单个姿态的空间变换器模型,忽略任何时间信息,该模型达到了异常高的准确率,突出了对外观信息的偏向,并表明现有基准中存在虚假相关性。这些发现强调了对基于视觉的步态识别中运动与外观之间相互作用进行细致理解的必要性,促使重新评估该领域的方法学假设。我们的实验表明,“野外”数据集较少受到虚假相关性的影响,促使需要更多样化的大规模数据集以推动该领域发展。

英文摘要:

Gait, an unobtrusive biometric, is valued for its capability to identify individuals at a distance, across external outfits and environmental conditions. This study challenges the prevailing assumption that vision-based gait recognition, in particular skeleton-based gait recognition, relies primarily on motion patterns, revealing a significant role of the implicit anthropometric information encoded in the walking sequence. We show through a comparative analysis that removing height information leads to notable performance degradation across three models and two benchmarks (CASIA-B and GREW). Furthermore, we propose a spatial transformer model processing individual poses, disregarding any temporal information, which achieves unreasonably good accuracy, emphasizing the bias towards appearance information and indicating spurious correlations in existing benchmarks. These findings underscore the need for a nuanced understanding of the interplay between motion and appearance in vision-based gait recognition, prompting a reevaluation of the methodological assumptions in this field. Our experiments indicate that "in-the-wild" datasets are less prone to spurious correlations, prompting the need for more diverse and large scale datasets for advancing the field.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑