arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2402.04643gr-qc
收藏

水星近日点进动

The advance of Mercury's perihelion

Bertrand Berche, Ernesto Medina

AI总结:

本文以本科水平重新审视水星近日点进动这一广义相对论著名检验,指出约50角秒/世纪的剩余进动无法用牛顿力学解释,并回顾爱因斯坦1914年的解决方案。

摘要:

广义相对论(GTR)的一个非常著名的“检验”是水星近日点(以及其他行星的近日点)的进动。更准确地说,这并不是广义相对论的预测,因为该异常在19世纪就已为人所知,但在广义相对论被提出时,尚未找到一致的解释。爱因斯坦在1914年提出了该问题的解决方案。对于水星——离太阳最近的行星——这一效应比其他行星更为显著,且从地球观测到;水星近日点每世纪进动约5550角秒(as/cy)。其中,约5000角秒(精确值为5025.645 as/cy)源于春分点岁差,约500角秒(531.54 as/cy)源于外行星的影响。剩余的约50角秒/世纪(42.56 as/cy)在牛顿力学框架内无法解释。在此,我们以本科水平重新详细审视该问题。

英文摘要:

A very famous ``test'' of the General Theory of Relativity (GTR) is the advance of Mercury's perihelion (and of other planets too). To be more precise, this is not a prediction of General Relativity, since the anomaly was known in the XIXth century, but no consistent explanation had been found yet at the time GTR was elaborated. Einstein came up with a solution to the problem in 1914. In the case of Mercury, the closest planet to the Sun, the effect is more pronounced than for other planets, and observed from Earth; there is an advance of the perihelion of Mercury of about 5550~arc seconds per century (as/cy). Among these, about $5000$ are due to the equinox precession (the precise value is {$5025.645$}~as/cy) and about $500$ ({$531.54$}) to the influence of the external planets. The remaining, about $50$~as/cy ({$42.56$}), are not understood within Newtonian mechanics. Here, we revisit the problem in some detail for a presentation at the undergraduate level.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑