arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.04485cs.LGcs.GT
收藏

联邦老虎机中的激励性真实通信

Incentivized Truthful Communication for Federated Bandits

University of Virginia(弗吉尼亚大学);University of Chicago(芝加哥大学)

Zhepei Wei, Chuanhao Li, Tianze Ren, Haifeng Xu, Hongning Wang

AI总结:

针对联邦老虎机中现有激励机制的诚实假设漏洞,提出激励兼容协议Truth-FedBan,使激励与报告成本无关,实现真实报告为最优策略,同时保持次线性遗憾和通信成本,首次实现激励兼容与近乎最优遗憾的兼得。

摘要:

为了提升联邦老虎机学习的效率和实用性,近期的进展引入了激励机制来鼓励客户端之间的通信,其中客户端仅在服务器提供的激励超过其参与成本时才参与。然而,现有的激励机制天真地假设客户端是诚实的:它们都报告其真实成本,因此一个参与的客户端声称的成本越高,服务器需要支付的费用就越多。因此,这类机制容易受到旨在通过虚报来优化自身效用的策略性客户端的攻击。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种激励兼容(即真实)的通信协议,名为Truth-FedBan,其中每个参与者的激励与其自我报告的成本无关,并且报告真实成本是实现最佳效用的唯一途径。更重要的是,Truth-FedBan仍然保证次线性遗憾和通信成本,且没有任何开销。换句话说,本文的核心概念贡献是首次证明了在联邦老虎机学习中同时实现激励兼容性和近乎最优遗憾的可能性。广泛的数值研究进一步验证了我们提出的解决方案的有效性。

英文摘要:

To enhance the efficiency and practicality of federated bandit learning, recent advances have introduced incentives to motivate communication among clients, where a client participates only when the incentive offered by the server outweighs its participation cost. However, existing incentive mechanisms naively assume the clients are truthful: they all report their true cost and thus the higher cost one participating client claims, the more the server has to pay. Therefore, such mechanisms are vulnerable to strategic clients aiming to optimize their own utility by misreporting. To address this issue, we propose an incentive compatible (i.e., truthful) communication protocol, named Truth-FedBan, where the incentive for each participant is independent of its self-reported cost, and reporting the true cost is the only way to achieve the best utility. More importantly, Truth-FedBan still guarantees the sub-linear regret and communication cost without any overheads. In other words, the core conceptual contribution of this paper is, for the first time, demonstrating the possibility of simultaneously achieving incentive compatibility and nearly optimal regret in federated bandit learning. Extensive numerical studies further validate the effectiveness of our proposed solution.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑