arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.01705cs.CYcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
收藏

超越行为主义表征性伤害:测量与缓解的计划

Beyond Behaviorist Representational Harms: A Plan for Measurement and Mitigation

UC San Diego(加利福尼亚大学圣迭戈分校)

Jennifer Chien, David Danks

AI总结:

本文通过审视现有表征性伤害定义的不足,提出超越行为主义、纳入认知与情感伤害的扩展框架,并结合大语言模型案例给出测量要求与缓解措施,以推动公平性研究走向实践。

摘要:

算法伤害通常被分类为分配性伤害或表征性伤害。本研究专门针对后者,重点审视当前表征性伤害的定义,以辨别其包含与未包含的内容。这一分析促使我们将定义扩展到行为性定义之外,以涵盖对认知和情感状态的伤害。本文概述了测量的高层次要求:确定实施该方法所需的专业知识,并通过案例研究加以说明。我们的工作强调了大语言模型在造成表征性伤害方面的独特脆弱性,尤其是当这些伤害未被测量和未被缓解时。本文最后提出了缓解措施,并界定了何时采用这些措施。本研究的总体目标是建立一个框架,以拓宽表征性伤害的定义,并将公平性研究的洞见转化为实际的测量与缓解实践。

英文摘要:

Algorithmic harms are commonly categorized as either allocative or representational. This study specifically addresses the latter, focusing on an examination of current definitions of representational harms to discern what is included and what is not. This analysis motivates our expansion beyond behavioral definitions to encompass harms to cognitive and affective states. The paper outlines high-level requirements for measurement: identifying the necessary expertise to implement this approach and illustrating it through a case study. Our work highlights the unique vulnerabilities of large language models to perpetrating representational harms, particularly when these harms go unmeasured and unmitigated. The work concludes by presenting proposed mitigations and delineating when to employ them. The overarching aim of this research is to establish a framework for broadening the definition of representational harms and to translate insights from fairness research into practical measurement and mitigation praxis.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑