arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.01423cs.CL

实体的不同品味:探究命名实体标注中的人类标注差异

Different Tastes of Entities: Investigating Human Label Variation in Named Entity Annotations

LMU Munich(慕尼黑大学);Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML)(慕尼黑机器学习中心)

Siyao Peng, Zihang Sun, Sebastian Loftus, Barbara Plank

AI总结:

本文研究英语、丹麦语和巴伐利亚语专家标注命名实体数据中的标注分歧,发现文本歧义和指南变更是主因,并通过学生标注调查证实多标注的可行性与必要性。

摘要:

命名实体识别(NER)是一项具有悠久传统的关键信息抽取任务。虽然近期研究通过重新标注工作来解决并纠正标注错误,但关于人类标注差异的来源(如文本歧义、标注错误或指南分歧)却知之甚少,尤其是在高质量数据集以及英语CoNLL03之外的数据集上。本文研究了三种语言(英语、丹麦语和巴伐利亚语)的专家标注命名实体数据集中的分歧。我们表明,文本歧义和人为的指南变更是高质量修订中多样化标注的主导因素。我们对困难实体子集上的学生标注进行了调查,并从分布视角证实了多种标注对于理解命名实体歧义的可行性和必要性。

英文摘要:

Named Entity Recognition (NER) is a key information extraction task with a long-standing tradition. While recent studies address and aim to correct annotation errors via re-labeling efforts, little is known about the sources of human label variation, such as text ambiguity, annotation error, or guideline divergence. This is especially the case for high-quality datasets and beyond English CoNLL03. This paper studies disagreements in expert-annotated named entity datasets for three languages: English, Danish, and Bavarian. We show that text ambiguity and artificial guideline changes are dominant factors for diverse annotations among high-quality revisions. We survey student annotations on a subset of difficult entities and substantiate the feasibility and necessity of manifold annotations for understanding named entity ambiguities from a distributional perspective.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑