arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.01019cs.CLcs.CRcs.CY
收藏

领域无关的欺骗行为:一种新的分类体系与语言学分析

Domain-Independent Deception: A New Taxonomy and Linguistic Analysis

University of Houston(休斯顿大学);Tel Aviv University(特拉维夫大学);InstaBase(InstaBase公司);University of California – Berkeley(加州大学伯克利分校)

Rakesh M. Verma, Nachum Dershowitz, Victor Zeng, Dainis Boumber, Xuting Liu

AI总结:

该研究针对当前欺骗检测多为领域特定的现状,梳理分散研究并探究领域无关欺骗,提出新的计算定义与分类体系,分析语言线索争议并给出综述指南,验证了不同欺骗形式间的知识迁移性。

摘要:

互联网经济与社会正饱受欺骗性攻击的困扰。这些攻击有多种形式,例如假新闻、网络钓鱼、求职诈骗,我们将其称为“欺骗领域”。机器学习与自然语言处理领域的研究者一直试图通过设计特定领域的检测器来改善这一严峻状况,仅有少数近期研究关注了领域无关的欺骗行为。我们梳理了这些分散的研究脉络,针对领域无关欺骗展开探究:首先提出了欺骗的计算化新定义,并将其拆解为新的分类体系;随后分析了关于欺骗语言线索的争议,给出系统性综述的实施指南;最后探究了共有的语言特征,为不同欺骗形式间的知识迁移提供了依据。

英文摘要:

Internet-based economies and societies are drowning in deceptive attacks. These attacks take many forms, such as fake news, phishing, and job scams, which we call ``domains of deception.'' Machine-learning and natural-language-processing researchers have been attempting to ameliorate this precarious situation by designing domain-specific detectors. Only a few recent works have considered domain-independent deception. We collect these disparate threads of research and investigate domain-independent deception. First, we provide a new computational definition of deception and break down deception into a new taxonomy. Then, we analyze the debate on linguistic cues for deception and supply guidelines for systematic reviews. Finally, we investigate common linguistic features and give evidence for knowledge transfer across different forms of deception.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑