arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2402.00399cs.RO
收藏

连续时间轨迹估计:高斯过程与基于样条方法的比较研究

Continuous-time Trajectory Estimation: A Comparative Study Between Gaussian Process and Spline-based Approaches

Brigham Young University(杨百翰大学);University of Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies(多伦多大学航空航天研究所)

Jacob Johnson, Joshua Mangelson, Timothy Barfoot, Randal Beard

AI总结:

本文针对连续时间轨迹估计问题,对高斯过程回归与基于样条的两类主流方法开展对比,通过线性系统、SE(3)下相机IMU融合的仿真与硬件实验验证,发现二者在同测量同运动模型下精度相当,可微阶数匹配时求解时间也相近。

摘要:

连续时间轨迹估计是离散时间批量估计的一种有吸引力的替代方案,因为它能够融合来自异步传感器的高频测量值,同时保持优化参数的数量有界。文献中主要流行两类连续时间估计方法:高斯过程回归和基于样条的估计。本文对这两种方法进行了直接比较。我们首先使用简单线性系统对二者进行对比,随后在SE(3)空间下的相机与IMU传感器融合场景中,分别通过仿真和硬件实验开展比较。结果表明,若使用相同的测量值和运动模型,两种方法可达到相近的轨迹精度。此外,若选择的样条阶数能让两种轨迹表示的可微阶数相匹配,二者的求解时间也相近。

英文摘要:

Continuous-time trajectory estimation is an attractive alternative to discrete-time batch estimation due to the ability to incorporate high-frequency measurements from asynchronous sensors while keeping the number of optimization parameters bounded. Two types of continuous-time estimation have become prevalent in the literature: Gaussian process regression and spline-based estimation. In this paper, we present a direct comparison between these two methods. We first compare them using a simple linear system, and then compare them in a camera and IMU sensor fusion scenario on SE(3) in both simulation and hardware. Our results show that if the same measurements and motion model are used, the two methods achieve similar trajectory accuracy. In addition, if the spline order is chosen so that the degree-of-differentiability of the two trajectory representations match, then they achieve similar solve times as well.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑