arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2401.12866cs.AIcs.LGcs.MA
收藏

评估移动众包中数据流支持协调的协作型与自主型智能体

Evaluating Collaborative and Autonomous Agents in Data-Stream-Supported Coordination of Mobile Crowdsourcing

University Rey Juan Carlos(胡安卡洛斯国王大学)

Ralf Bruns, Jeremias Dötterl, Jürgen Dunkel, Sascha Ossowski

AI总结:

针对移动众包任务失败率高且任务转移难的问题,本文结合数据流学习预测任务结果,并提出协作型机会主义与自主型市场化两种协调方法。

摘要:

移动众包是指任务的完成必然需要按需劳动力中的众包工作者进行实际移动的系统。证据表明,在此类系统中,任务常被分配给难以成功完成这些任务的工作者,从而导致高失败率和低服务质量。确保更高服务质量的一个有前景的解决方案,是通过将任务转移给使用不同路线或交通工具、更适合的工作者,持续调整分配并响应导致失败的事件。然而,在移动众包中实施任务转移十分困难,因为工作者是自主的,可能拒绝转移请求。此外,任务结果具有不确定性,需要进行预测。本文提出了用于在移动众包中实现结果预测和任务协调的不同机制。首先,我们分析了用于预测任务结果的不同数据流学习方法。其次,基于所提出的预测模型,我们提出并评估了两种具有不同自主程度的任务协调方法:一种面向人群配送、适用于协作者但非自主工作者的机会主义方法,以及一种面向人群感知、采用自主工作者的基于市场模型。

英文摘要:

Mobile crowdsourcing refers to systems where the completion of tasks necessarily requires physical movement of crowdworkers in an on-demand workforce. Evidence suggests that in such systems, tasks often get assigned to crowdworkers who struggle to complete those tasks successfully, resulting in high failure rates and low service quality. A promising solution to ensure higher quality of service is to continuously adapt the assignment and respond to failure-causing events by transferring tasks to better-suited workers who use different routes or vehicles. However, implementing task transfers in mobile crowdsourcing is difficult because workers are autonomous and may reject transfer requests. Moreover, task outcomes are uncertain and need to be predicted. In this paper, we propose different mechanisms to achieve outcome prediction and task coordination in mobile crowdsourcing. First, we analyze different data stream learning approaches for the prediction of task outcomes. Second, based on the suggested prediction model, we propose and evaluate two different approaches for task coordination with different degrees of autonomy: an opportunistic approach for crowdshipping with collaborative, but non-autonomous workers, and a market-based model with autonomous workers for crowdsensing.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑