arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2401.05409eess.SPcs.AIcs.LG
收藏

基于图像的时间序列数据表示:脑电图伪影检测中的比较分析

Image-based Data Representations of Time Series: A Comparative Analysis in EEG Artifact Detection

University of Osnabrück(奥斯纳布吕克大学);Stanford University(斯坦福大学)

Aaron Maiwald, Leon Ackermann, Maximilian Kalcher, Daniel J. Wu

AI总结:

本文以脑电图伪影检测为测试平台,系统比较六种图像化时间序列表示方法与十一种深度学习架构的组合效果,发现部分表示更能提升信噪比,并开源测试框架以支持后续比较研究。

摘要:

替代数据表示是增强下游模型性能的强大工具。然而,机器学习工具箱中此类表示方法数量众多,该领域缺乏对每种表示方法适用性的比较性理解。在本文中,我们提出将脑电图数据中的伪影检测与分类作为评测基于图像的时间序列数据表示的测试平台。随后,我们在六种常用表示方法上评估了十一种流行的深度学习架构。我们发现,虽然表示方法的选择意味着在偏差与方差之间进行权衡,但某些表示在实际中能更有效地突出特征,从而提高数据的信噪比。我们展示了在脑电图数据上的结果,并开源了我们的测试框架,以便未来开展此类比较分析。

英文摘要:

Alternative data representations are powerful tools that augment the performance of downstream models. However, there is an abundance of such representations within the machine learning toolbox, and the field lacks a comparative understanding of the suitability of each representation method. In this paper, we propose artifact detection and classification within EEG data as a testbed for profiling image-based data representations of time series data. We then evaluate eleven popular deep learning architectures on each of six commonly-used representation methods. We find that, while the choice of representation entails a choice within the tradeoff between bias and variance, certain representations are practically more effective in highlighting features which increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the data. We present our results on EEG data, and open-source our testing framework to enable future comparative analyses in this vein.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑