arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2312.10637cs.CVcs.AI

对GPT-4V和Gemini在在线VQA中的评估

An Evaluation of GPT-4V and Gemini in Online VQA

Microsoft(微软公司);University of Texas at Austin(德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校);University of Colorado Boulder(科罗拉多大学博尔德分校)

Mengchen Liu, Chongyan Chen, Danna Gurari

AI总结:

本文在真实在线问答社区数据集上评估GPT-4V和Gemini,通过细粒度元数据与零样本分析揭示了这两类大型多模态模型最具挑战性的问题类型。

摘要:

尽管人们对大型多模态模型(LMM)的潜力充满期待,但全面的评估对于确立其真实能力和局限性至关重要。为此,我们在一个源自真实在线问答社区的全新视觉问答数据集上,评估了两种最先进的LMM:GPT-4V和Gemini。我们通过为近2,000个视觉问题生成七类元数据(如图像类型和所需的图像处理能力)来进行细粒度分析。零样本性能分析突出了这两类模型最具挑战性的问题类型,包括与“puzzling”主题相关、用户意图为“Identification”、图像类型为“Sheet Music”或被GPT-4标记为“hard”的问题。

英文摘要:

While there is much excitement about the potential of large multimodal models (LMM), a comprehensive evaluation is critical to establish their true capabilities and limitations. In support of this aim, we evaluate two state-of-the-art LMMs, GPT-4V and Gemini, on a new visual question answering dataset sourced from an authentic online question answering community. We conduct fine-grained analysis by generating seven types of metadata for nearly 2,000 visual questions, such as image type and the required image processing capabilities. Our zero-shot performance analysis highlights the types of questions that are most challenging for both models, including questions related to "puzzling" topic, with "Identification" user intention, with "Sheet Music" image type, or labeled as "hard" by GPT-4.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑