arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2312.09548cs.CYcs.AIcs.HC
收藏

整合人工智能与学习分析以支持数据驱动的教学决策和教育中的个性化干预

Integrating AI and Learning Analytics for Data-Driven Pedagogical Decisions and Personalized Interventions in Education

University of Iowa(爱荷华大学)

Ramteja Sajja, Yusuf Sermet, David Cwiertny, Ibrahim Demir

AI总结:

本研究利用GPT-4开发学习分析工具,量化学生参与度并评估教学策略,以支持数据驱动的个性化教育决策。

摘要:

本研究探讨了一种创新性学习分析工具的概念化、开发与部署,该工具利用OpenAI的GPT-4模型来量化学生参与度、绘制学习进展图,并评估教育情境中的多样化教学策略。通过分析学生压力水平、好奇心、困惑、焦虑、主题偏好和学习方法等关键数据点,该工具提供了学习环境的全面视图。它还采用布鲁姆分类法,基于学生的提问来评估认知发展。除了通过合成数据进行技术评估外,还收集了爱荷华大学教学人员的调查反馈,以评估其感知到的益处和挑战。教师们认可该工具通过实时洞察增强教学决策的潜力,但对数据安全性和AI生成洞察的准确性表示担忧。本研究概述了该工具的设计、实施和评估,强调了其对教育成果的贡献、在学习管理系统中的实际整合,以及未来为解决隐私和准确性问题所需的改进。这项研究凸显了AI在塑造个性化、数据驱动教育中的作用。

英文摘要:

This research study explores the conceptualization, development, and deployment of an innovative learning analytics tool, leveraging OpenAI's GPT-4 model to quantify student engagement, map learning progression, and evaluate diverse instructional strategies within an educational context. By analyzing critical data points such as students' stress levels, curiosity, confusion, agitation, topic preferences, and study methods, the tool provides a comprehensive view of the learning environment. It also employs Bloom's taxonomy to assess cognitive development based on student inquiries. In addition to technical evaluation through synthetic data, feedback from a survey of teaching faculty at the University of Iowa was collected to gauge perceived benefits and challenges. Faculty recognized the tool's potential to enhance instructional decision-making through real-time insights but expressed concerns about data security and the accuracy of AI-generated insights. The study outlines the design, implementation, and evaluation of the tool, highlighting its contributions to educational outcomes, practical integration within learning management systems, and future refinements needed to address privacy and accuracy concerns. This research underscores AI's role in shaping personalized, data-driven education.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑