arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2312.08040math.STstat.MEstat.TH
收藏

事后α假设检验与事后p值

Post-hoc $α$ Hypothesis Testing and the Post-hoc $p$-value

Nick W. Koning

AI总结:

本文提出事后p值概念,通过保证期望中无大小扭曲,实现更可靠的假设检验,并扩展至最优事后检验,同时将马尔可夫不等式转化为事后α等式。

摘要:

在传统的假设检验中,必须预先指定显著性水平α以限制检验的'大小',即其错误拒绝假设的概率。事实上,数据依赖的α选择通常会扭曲大小,可能使其大于指定的α水平。我们探索通过保证期望中没有此类大小扭曲的假设检验方法,即使α水平是根据数据任意选择的。与常规的p值不同,所得到的'事后p值'允许我们'在p水平上拒绝',并仍提供这种保证。有趣的是,我们发现p是事后p值当且仅当1/p是最近引入的证据测量e值。虽然通常被视为不同的范式,这揭示了e值实际上是p值在更强的误差保证下的表现,被递归的p=1/e所掩盖。此外,我们扩展了经典的最优检验到最优事后检验。最后,我们将我们的工作应用于将马尔可夫不等式闭合为事后α等式,并研究更一般的事后检验形式,这要求我们超越e值。

英文摘要:

In traditional hypothesis testing one must pre-specify the significance level $α$ to bound the `size' of the test: its probability to falsely reject the hypothesis. Indeed, a data-dependent selection of $α$ would generally distort the size, possibly making it larger than the specified level $α$. We explore hypothesis testing with a data-dependent choice of $α$ by guaranteeing that there is no such size distortion in expectation, even if the level $α$ is arbitrarily selected based on the data. Unlike regular $p$-values, resulting `post-hoc $p$-values' allow us to `reject at level $p$' and still provide this guarantee. Interestingly, we find that $p$ is a post-hoc $p$-value if and only if $1/p$ is an $e$-value, a recently introduced measure of evidence. While often treated as different paradigms, this reveals $e$-values are simply $p$-values under a stronger error guarantee, thinly veiled by the reciprocal $p = 1/e$. Moreover, we extend classical optimal testing to optimal post-hoc testing. Finally, we apply our work to close Markov's inequality into a post-hoc $α$ equality, and we study more general forms of post-hoc testing that require us to generalize beyond $e$-values.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑