arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2312.06348cs.LG

DiffAIL:扩散对抗模仿学习

DiffAIL: Diffusion Adversarial Imitation Learning

Shandong University(山东大学)

Bingzheng Wang, Guoqiang Wu, Teng Pang, Yan Zhang, Yilong Yin

AI总结:

针对传统对抗模仿学习中判别器分布学习不准确的问题,提出将扩散模型引入AIL框架的DiffAIL方法,通过扩散损失优化判别器,在两项基准任务上取得超越专家演示的最优性能。

摘要:

模仿学习旨在解决现实决策任务中奖励函数定义困难的问题。当前主流方法是对抗模仿学习(Adversarial Imitation Learning,AIL)框架,该框架通过匹配专家的状态-动作占用度量,为前向强化学习获取替代奖励。然而,传统判别器是简单的二分类器,无法学习到准确的分布,这可能导致其无法识别由策略与环境交互产生的专家级状态-动作对。为解决该问题,我们提出名为扩散对抗模仿学习(diffusion adversarial imitation learning,DiffAIL)的方法,将扩散模型引入AIL框架。具体而言,DiffAIL将状态-动作对建模为无条件扩散模型,并将扩散损失作为判别器学习目标的一部分,使判别器能更好地捕捉专家演示并提升泛化能力。实验结果表明,我们的方法在两项基准任务(包括标准状态-动作设置和仅状态设置)上取得了当前最优性能,且显著超越专家演示水平。我们的代码可通过链接https://github.com/ML-Group-SDU/DiffAIL获取。

英文摘要:

Imitation learning aims to solve the problem of defining reward functions in real-world decision-making tasks. The current popular approach is the Adversarial Imitation Learning (AIL) framework, which matches expert state-action occupancy measures to obtain a surrogate reward for forward reinforcement learning. However, the traditional discriminator is a simple binary classifier and doesn't learn an accurate distribution, which may result in failing to identify expert-level state-action pairs induced by the policy interacting with the environment. To address this issue, we propose a method named diffusion adversarial imitation learning (DiffAIL), which introduces the diffusion model into the AIL framework. Specifically, DiffAIL models the state-action pairs as unconditional diffusion models and uses diffusion loss as part of the discriminator's learning objective, which enables the discriminator to capture better expert demonstrations and improve generalization. Experimentally, the results show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance and significantly surpasses expert demonstration on two benchmark tasks, including the standard state-action setting and state-only settings. Our code can be available at the link https://github.com/ML-Group-SDU/DiffAIL.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑