arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2312.01351eess.IVcs.CV

用于肺栓塞诊断的深度学习与传统CAD方案:综述

Deep learning and traditional-based CAD schemes for the pulmonary embolism diagnosis: A survey

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad(马什哈德费尔多西大学);Rayan Center for Neuroscience and Behavior(拉扬神经科学与行为中心)

Seyed Hesamoddin Hosseini, Amir Hossein Taherinia, Mahdi Saadatmand

AI总结:

本文综述并比较了2002至2023年间23篇基于深度学习和传统CAD的肺栓塞自动诊断研究,从灵敏度、假阳性数和数据集规模等方面评估性能,为医生和研究者提供更全面的参考。

摘要:

如今,肺部计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)是检测肺栓塞(PE)的主要工具。然而,由于肺组织的特殊状况、数据量大、经验不足和眼睛疲劳,人工解读CTA体数据需要放射科医生,既耗时又容易出错。因此,计算机辅助设计(CAD)系统被用作PE诊断的第二意见。本文旨在回顾、评估和比较基于深度学习和传统CAD系统诊断PE的性能,并帮助该领域的医生和研究人员。在本研究中,对IEEE、ScienceDirect、Wiley、Springer、Nature和Wolters Kluwer等数据库中PE诊断领域的所有可用文章进行了检查,采用传统和深度学习方法。从2002年到2023年,研究了23篇论文,以提取具有所考虑限制条件的文章。每篇论文都提出了一个自动PE检测系统,我们使用灵敏度、假阳性(FP)和数据集数量等标准对其进行评估。与先前在该研究领域发表的综述文章相比,本研究工作包括近期研究、最先进的研究成果以及更全面的概述。

英文摘要:

Nowadays, pulmonary Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) is the main tool for detecting Pulmonary Embolism (PE). However, manual interpretation of CTA volume requires a radiologist, which is time-consuming and error-prone due to the specific conditions of lung tissue, large volume of data, lack of experience, and eye fatigue. Therefore, Computer-Aided Design (CAD) systems are used as a second opinion for the diagnosis of PE. The purpose of this article is to review, evaluate, and compare the performance of deep learning and traditional-based CAD system for diagnosis PE and to help physicians and researchers in this field. In this study, all articles available in databases such as IEEE, ScienceDirect, Wiley, Springer, Nature, and Wolters Kluwer in the field of PE diagnosis were examined using traditional and deep learning methods. From 2002 to 2023, 23 papers were studied to extract the articles with the considered limitations. Each paper presents an automatic PE detection system that we evaluate using criteria such as sensitivity, False Positives (FP), and the number of datasets. This research work includes recent studies, state-of-the-art research works, and a more comprehensive overview compared to previously published review articles in this research area.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑