arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2312.00565hep-phhep-ex
收藏

用反应堆率数据检验镓异常的各种解决方案

Confronting solutions of the Gallium Anomaly with reactor rate data

Carlo Giunti, Christoph A. Ternes

AI总结:

本文检验了多种解释镓异常的3+1中微子混合扩展模型,发现它们仍无法消除与反应堆率数据的张力,而基于三中微子混合的非标准退相干模型则与反应堆率数据相容。

摘要:

最近,有人提出了若干模型,以减小在3+1活性-惰性中微子混合框架下发现的镓实验与反应堆反中微子谱比数据之间的张力。在这些模型中,我们考虑了3+1混合的几种扩展:有限波包尺寸、最重中微子ν₄的衰变,以及ν₄具有较宽质量分布的可能性。我们考察了反应堆反中微子率数据,并表明这些模型无法消除在3+1中微子混合框架下发现的镓实验与反应堆率数据之间的张力。实际上,我们表明参数的拟合优度仍然很小。我们还考虑了一个在三中微子混合框架下用非标准退相干解释镓异常的模型。我们发现该模型与反应堆率数据相容。

英文摘要:

Recently, several models have been suggested to reduce the tension between Gallium and reactor antineutrino spectral ratio data which is found in the framework of 3+1 active-sterile neutrino mixing. Among these models, we consider the extensions of 3+1 mixing with a finite wavepacket size, or the decay of the heaviest neutrino $ν_4$, or the possibility to have a broad $ν_4$ mass distribution. We consider the reactor antineutrino rate data and we show that these models cannot liminate the tension between Gallium and reactor rate data that is found in the 3+1 neutrino mixing framework. Indeed, we show that the parameter goodness of fit remains small. We consider also a model which explains the Gallium Anomaly with non-standard decoherence in the framework of three-neutrino mixing. We find that it is compatible with the reactor rate data.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑