国际研究团队如何应对其流动模式的中断
How international research teams respond to disruption in their mobility patterns
AI总结：
本文结合社会网络分析与访谈，研究三个非洲国际研究网络的结构与多样性如何增强其韧性，并发现距离和边界限制国际合作，而团队通过强化自身优势应对流动中断。
摘要：
本文将社会网络分析与个人访谈相结合，考察了三个以非洲为重点的国际研究网络的社会结构和内部构成如何促进其韧性。研究表明，研究网络围绕少数极具影响力的协调者组织起来。这种结构促进了国家之间以及跨领域的信息交流与信任。研究还表明，受访团队倾向于交换信息或相互信任，而不论其社会与专业属性如何，这表明多样性是理解其对诸如COVID-19大流行等重大冲击反应的关键。在第二部分中，本文分析了距离和边界所施加的空间限制如何影响其国际运作能力。研究表明，交换信息、相互信任和共同发表论文的概率随距离增加而显著下降，且研究社区更可能在国内而非国际上形成。访谈揭示，团队通过强调其已擅长的领域来应对旅行禁令和边境关闭，这表明韧性应被视为系统的一种演化属性。
英文摘要：
Combining social network analysis with personal interviews, the paper examines how the social structure and internal composition of three Africa-focused international research networks contributes to their resilience. It shows that research networks are structured around a small number of highly influential coordinators. This structure facilitates information exchange and trust between countries and across fields. The study also suggests that the surveyed teams tend to exchange information or trust each other irrespective of their social and professional attributes, indicating that diversity is key to understanding their responses to major shocks such as the COVID-19 pandemic. In a second part, the paper analyzes how the spatial constraints imposed by distance and borders affect their ability to function internationally. It shows that the probability of exchanging information, trusting each other, and co-publishing decreases considerably with distance and that research communities are more likely formed inside the same country than internationally. Interviews reveal that teams responded to travel bans and border closure by emphasizing what they already did best, suggesting that resilience should be considered as an evolutionary attribute of a system.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
