arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2311.04559cs.CY
收藏

计算机科学中的个体不平等与性别不平等:1970至2000年队列的职业研究

Individual and gender inequality in computer science: A career study of cohorts from 1970 to 2000

Haiko Lietz, Mohsen Jadidi, Daniel Kostic, Milena Tsvetkova, Claudia Wagner

AI总结:

该研究利用1970至2000年计算机科学领域的大规模文献数据,揭示个体产出不平等随职业发展加剧但历史不变、影响力不平等保持稳定,并发现马太效应强化了性别产出差距,建议通过导师计划提升女性社交技能以缓解性别不平等。

摘要:

不平等在科学界普遍存在。个体不平等意味着大多数人很快被淘汰,只有少数人取得成功;而性别不平等则意味着女性和男性在成就上存在差异。利用大规模文献数据并采用计算方法,我们研究了计算机科学整个领域中1970至2000年各队列的个体不平等和性别不平等的演变,该领域在此期间不断成长并成为以团队为基础的科学。我们发现,个体在产出(发表论文数)上的不平等随着学者职业生涯的发展而增加,但在历史上保持不变;而个体在影响力(被引次数)上的不平等虽然更大,但在不同队列和职业生涯中保持稳定。性别不平等在产出方面普遍存在,但没有证据表明在影响力方面存在差异。马太效应被证明会为早期成就积累优势,并且在过去几十年中变得更强,表明“不发表就出局”的强制要求正在兴起。只有部分作者能够获得团队发表所承诺的收益。马太效应随后放大了初始差异并扩大了性别差距。女性继续落后,因为她们仍然面临更高的退出风险,而这些风险与早期职业成就或社会支持无关。我们的研究结果表明,旨在提高女性社交网络技能的导师计划有助于减少性别不平等。

英文摘要:

Inequality prevails in science. Individual inequality means that most perish quickly and only a few are successful, while gender inequality implies that there are differences in achievements for women and men. Using large-scale bibliographic data and following a computational approach, we study the evolution of individual and gender inequality for cohorts from 1970 to 2000 in the whole field of computer science as it grows and becomes a team-based science. We find that individual inequality in productivity (publications) increases over a scholar's career but is historically invariant, while individual inequality in impact (citations), albeit larger, is stable across cohorts and careers. Gender inequality prevails regarding productivity, but there is no evidence for differences in impact. The Matthew Effect is shown to accumulate advantages to early achievements and to become stronger over the decades, indicating the rise of a "publish or perish" imperative. Only some authors manage to reap the benefits that publishing in teams promises. The Matthew Effect then amplifies initial differences and propagates the gender gap. Women continue to fall behind because they continue to be at a higher risk of dropping out for reasons that have nothing to do with early-career achievements or social support. Our findings suggest that mentoring programs for women to improve their social-networking skills can help to reduce gender inequality.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑