arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2310.14520cs.CL

QUDEVAL:讨论中问题(QUD)语篇解析的评估

QUDEVAL: The Evaluation of Questions Under Discussion Discourse Parsing

The University of Texas at Austin(德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校)

Yating Wu, Ritika Mangla, Greg Durrett, Junyi Jessy Li

AI总结:

本文提出首个 QUD 语篇解析自动评估框架 QUDeval,通过 2,190 个问题的细粒度标注揭示现代 LLM 与现有指标的不足。

摘要:

讨论中问题(Questions Under Discussion,QUD)是一个多功能的语言学框架,在该框架中,语篇通过不断提出问题并回答问题而推进。因此,自动解析语篇以生成 QUD 结构意味着一项复杂的问题生成任务:给定一篇文档和一个答句,生成一个满足 QUD 语言学约束、并能锚定到先前上下文中某个锚点句的问题。众所周知,这类问题由好奇心驱动,并且是开放式的。本工作首次引入了用于自动评估 QUD 解析的框架,将 QUD 的理论约束具体化为一套明确协议。我们提出了 QUDeval,这是一个细粒度评估数据集,包含 2,190 个由微调系统和 LLM 生成的 QUD 问题。借助 QUDeval,我们表明,对现代 LLM 而言,满足 QUD 的全部约束仍然具有挑战性,而且现有评估指标难以很好地近似解析器质量。令人鼓舞的是,人工撰写的 QUD 会被我们的人类评估者给出高分,这表明语言建模仍有进一步提升的空间,可同时改进 QUD 解析与 QUD 评估。

英文摘要:

Questions Under Discussion (QUD) is a versatile linguistic framework in which discourse progresses as continuously asking questions and answering them. Automatic parsing of a discourse to produce a QUD structure thus entails a complex question generation task: given a document and an answer sentence, generate a question that satisfies linguistic constraints of QUD and can be grounded in an anchor sentence in prior context. These questions are known to be curiosity-driven and open-ended. This work introduces the first framework for the automatic evaluation of QUD parsing, instantiating the theoretical constraints of QUD in a concrete protocol. We present QUDeval, a dataset of fine-grained evaluation of 2,190 QUD questions generated from both fine-tuned systems and LLMs. Using QUDeval, we show that satisfying all constraints of QUD is still challenging for modern LLMs, and that existing evaluation metrics poorly approximate parser quality. Encouragingly, human-authored QUDs are scored highly by our human evaluators, suggesting that there is headroom for further progress on language modeling to improve both QUD parsing and QUD evaluation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑