arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2310.00530cs.CV
收藏

多分块神经辐射场(NeRF)——大规模航空数据集上的几何评估

Multi-tiling Neural Radiance Field (NeRF) -- Geometric Assessment on Large-scale Aerial Datasets

Ningli Xu, Rongjun Qin, Debao Huang, Fabio Remondino

AI总结:

本文针对大规模航空数据上NeRF内存消耗高、收敛慢的问题,提出位置特定采样与多相机分块策略,并在Mip-NeRF上实现,通过航空数据集与LiDAR基准验证其在几何完整性和细节上优于传统MVS方法,但精度仍有差距。

摘要:

神经辐射场(NeRF)有潜力惠及包括航空摄影测量在内的三维重建任务。然而,对于大规模航空资产而言,其推断几何的可扩展性和精度尚未得到充分记录,因为此类数据集通常会导致极高的内存消耗和缓慢的收敛速度。在本文中,我们旨在将NeRF扩展应用于大规模航空数据集,并对NeRF进行全面的几何评估。具体而言,我们引入了一种位置特定采样技术以及一种多相机分块(MCT)策略,以减少图像加载时的RAM内存消耗和表示训练时的GPU内存消耗,并提高分块内的收敛速度。MCT将大帧图像分解为具有不同相机模型的多幅分块图像,使这些小帧图像能够根据特定位置的需要输入训练过程,而不会损失精度。我们在代表性方法Mip-NeRF上实现了我们的方法,并在两个典型航空数据集上,以LiDAR参考数据为基准,将其几何性能与三个摄影测量MVS流程进行了比较。定性和定量结果均表明,所提出的NeRF方法在完整性和物体细节方面优于传统方法,尽管目前其在精度方面仍有不足。

英文摘要:

Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) offer the potential to benefit 3D reconstruction tasks, including aerial photogrammetry. However, the scalability and accuracy of the inferred geometry are not well-documented for large-scale aerial assets,since such datasets usually result in very high memory consumption and slow convergence.. In this paper, we aim to scale the NeRF on large-scael aerial datasets and provide a thorough geometry assessment of NeRF. Specifically, we introduce a location-specific sampling technique as well as a multi-camera tiling (MCT) strategy to reduce memory consumption during image loading for RAM, representation training for GPU memory, and increase the convergence rate within tiles. MCT decomposes a large-frame image into multiple tiled images with different camera models, allowing these small-frame images to be fed into the training process as needed for specific locations without a loss of accuracy. We implement our method on a representative approach, Mip-NeRF, and compare its geometry performance with threephotgrammetric MVS pipelines on two typical aerial datasets against LiDAR reference data. Both qualitative and quantitative results suggest that the proposed NeRF approach produces better completeness and object details than traditional approaches, although as of now, it still falls short in terms of accuracy.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑