arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2309.08068physics.comp-ph

两种用于电动力学的Lattice Boltzmann模型比较

A Comparison of Two Lattice Boltzmann Models for Electrodynamics

Jorge I. Rubiano-Murcia, Alejandro M. Salas-Estrada, Jose D. Hernandez-Ortega

AI总结:

本文对比了用于电动力学的MM和HV两种Lattice Boltzmann模型,在四项标准测试中评估其时间与内存效率,发现MM方法耗时更短但内存效率较低,改进的HV模型是极具前景的替代方案。

摘要:

近年来,作为时域有限差分(FDTD)和有限元方法(FEM)等经典方法的替代方案,多种用于电动力学的Lattice Boltzmann模型被开发出来。然而,这些模型之间一直缺乏系统性的比较。本文通过比较分别由Mendoza和Muñoz(MM)以及Hauser和Verhey(HV)提出的两种特定Lattice Boltzmann模型来填补这一空白。为了比较这些模型,我们在四项标准测试中以时间和内存作为指标,并考虑达到相同的误差精度。这四项测试为:穿过两个界面的介电脉冲、趋肤效应、赫兹偶极子以及穿过多个界面的介电脉冲。结果表明,这两种方法都能准确模拟测试,并随着网格的细化表现出收敛性。然而,MM方法在时间上优于HV方法,而其内存效率较低。改进的Hauser-Verhey模型证明自身是Mendoza-Muñoz模型的一种极具前景的替代方案。这些发现有助于电磁模拟数值方法的持续发展与优化。

英文摘要:

In recent years, various Lattice Boltzmann models for electrodynamics have been developed as alternatives to classical methods such as Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) and Finite Element Methods (FEM). However, there has been a lack of systematic comparisons between these models. This paper addresses this gap by comparing two specific Lattice Boltzmann models, published by Mendoza and Muñoz (MM), and Hauser and Verhey (HV), respectively. To compare the models, we utilize time and memory as indicators, considering the same achieved error, in four standard tests: a dielectric pulse traveling through two interfaces, the skin effect, the Hertz dipole, and a dielectric pulse traveling through several interfaces. The results indicate that both methods accurately simulate the tests and exhibit convergence as the mesh is refined. However, the MM method outperforms the HV method regarding time, while its memory efficiency was lower. The modified Hauser-Verhey model demonstrates itself to be a promising alternative to the Mendoza-Muñoz model. These findings contribute to the ongoing development and optimization of numerical methods for electromagnetics simulations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑