arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2309.04415physics.flu-dyn
收藏

OpenFOAM中大涡模拟的最小耗散模型——关于槽道流、周期性山丘和圆柱绕流的研究

Minimum-dissipation model for large-eddy simulation in OpenFoam -A study on channel flow, periodic hills and flow over cylinder

Jing Sun, Roel Verstappen

AI总结:

本文在OpenFOAM中对槽道流、圆柱绕流和周期性山丘绕流应用最小耗散(QR)模型,发现静态QR模型在降低计算成本的同时表现媲美动态模型,且对称保持离散与中心差分格式结合能取得最佳预测效果。

摘要:

最小耗散模型被应用于高达 $Re_τ= 2000$ 的湍流槽道流、$Re=3900$ 的圆柱绕流以及 $Re=10595$ 的周期性山丘绕流。数值模拟在 OpenFOAM 中进行,该软件基于有限体积方法对偏微分方程进行离散。我们在结构化网格上使用了 OpenFOAM 中的对称保持离散和标准二阶精度离散方法。结果与 DNS 和实验数据进行了比较。槽道流的结果主要表明,静态 QR 模型的表现与动态模型同样出色,同时降低了计算成本。模型常数 $C=0.024$ 给出了最准确的预测,并且亚网格模型的贡献随着网格分辨率的增加而减小,如果使用精细网格,则变得非常小(小于 0.2 分子粘度)。此外,QR 模型能够在高达 $Re_τ= 2000$ 的条件下准确预测平均速度和 rms 速度,且无需壁面阻尼函数。在 $Re_τ=1000$ 时,对称保持离散优于标准 OpenFOAM 离散。圆柱绕流的结果表明,平均速度、阻力系数和升力系数与实验数据吻合良好。采用 QR 模型的对称保持方案预测结果最佳。针对周期性山丘绕流进行的各种比较表明,有必要在 OpenFOAM 中将对称保持离散或中心差分格式与最小耗散模型结合使用。模型常数 $C=0.024$ 再次被证明是最佳的。

英文摘要:

The minimum-dissipation model is applied to turbulent channel flows up to $Re_τ= 2000$, flow past a circular cylinder at $Re=3900$, and flow over periodic hills at $Re=10595$. Numerical simulations are performed in OpenFOAM which is based on finite volume methods for discretizing partial differential equations. We use both symmetry-preserving discretizations and standard second-order accurate discretization methods in OpenFOAM on structured meshes. The results are compared to DNS and experimental data. The results of channel flow mainly demonstrate the static QR model performs equally well as the dynamic models while reducing the computational cost. The model constant $C=0.024$ gives the most accurate prediction, and the contribution of the sub-grid model decreases with the increase of the mesh resolution and becomes very small (less than 0.2 molecular viscosity) if the fine meshes are used. Furthermore, the QR model is able to predict the mean and rms velocity accurately up to $Re_τ= 2000$ without a wall damping function. The symmetry-preserving discretization outperforms the standard OpenFOAM discretization at $Re_τ=1000$. The results for the flow over a cylinder show that mean velocity, drag coefficient, and lift coefficient are in good agreement with the experimental data. The symmetry-preserving scheme with the QR model predicts the best results. The various comparisons carried out for flows over periodic hills demonstrate the need to use the symmetry-preserving discretization or central difference schemes in OpenFOAM in combination with the minimum dissipation model. The model constant of $C=0.024$ is again the best one.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑