arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2308.14369physics.med-phcs.CV

改进数字化乳腺X线摄影中的病灶体积测量

Improving Lesion Volume Measurements on Digital Mammograms

Netherlands Cancer Institute(荷兰癌症研究所);Radboud University Medical Center(拉德堡德大学医学中心)

Nikita Moriakov, Jim Peters, Ritse Mann, Nico Karssemeijer, Jos van Dijck, Mireille Broeders, Jonas Teuwen

AI总结:

本研究针对临床常用的处理后乳腺X线图像,结合基于物理的原始图像病灶体积测量算法与深度学习图像转换模型,实现了精准的病灶体积测量,验证了其高可靠性与良好有效性。

摘要:

病灶体积是乳腺癌预后的重要预测指标。我们通过开发一款可在处理后乳腺X线图像上估算病灶体积的模型,朝着更精准的数字化乳腺X线病灶体积测量迈出了一步;处理后乳腺X线图像是放射科医生在临床实践及乳腺癌筛查中常规使用的图像,在各医疗中心均有配备。处理后乳腺X线图像由原始乳腺X线图像(即直接来自扫描仪的X射线数据)经厂商特有的非线性变换处理得到。我们的体积估算方法核心是一种基于物理的算法,用于测量原始乳腺X线图像上的病灶体积。随后,我们通过深度学习图像到图像转换模型将该算法扩展至处理后乳腺X线图像,该模型可在多厂商设备场景下从处理后乳腺X线图像生成合成原始乳腺X线图像。我们使用包含1778张带有标注肿块的乳腺X线图像的数据集,评估了该方法的可靠性与有效性。首先,我们探究了从内外侧斜位和头尾位视图计算得到的病灶体积之间的相关性,所得皮尔逊相关系数为0.93[95%置信区间(CI)0.92-0.93]。其次,我们比较了真实原始数据与合成原始数据得到的病灶体积,所得皮尔逊相关系数为0.998[95%CI 0.998-0.998]。最后,针对100张伴有恶性肿块且同步接受MRI检查的乳腺X线图像子集,我们分析了乳腺X线摄影与MRI测得的病灶体积之间的一致性,结果显示一致性的组内相关系数为0.81[95%CI 0.73-0.87],绝对一致性的组内相关系数为0.78[95%CI 0.66-0.86]。综上,我们开发了一种测量乳腺X线病灶体积的算法,以MRI作为金标准时,该算法具备出色的可靠性与良好的有效性。

英文摘要:

Lesion volume is an important predictor for prognosis in breast cancer. We make a step towards a more accurate lesion volume measurement on digital mammograms by developing a model that allows to estimate lesion volumes on processed mammograms, which are the images routinely used by radiologists in clinical practice as well as in breast cancer screening and are available in medical centers. Processed mammograms are obtained from raw mammograms, which are the X-ray data coming directly from the scanner, by applying certain vendor-specific non-linear transformations. At the core of our volume estimation method is a physics-based algorithm for measuring lesion volumes on raw mammograms. We subsequently extend this algorithm to processed mammograms via a deep learning image-to-image translation model that produces synthetic raw mammograms from processed mammograms in a multi-vendor setting. We assess the reliability and validity of our method using a dataset of 1778 mammograms with an annotated mass. Firstly, we investigate the correlations between lesion volumes computed from mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal views, with a resulting Pearson correlation of 0.93 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92 - 0.93]. Secondly, we compare the resulting lesion volumes from true and synthetic raw data, with a resulting Pearson correlation of 0.998 [95% CI 0.998 - 0.998] . Finally, for a subset of 100 mammograms with a malign mass and concurrent MRI examination available, we analyze the agreement between lesion volume on mammography and MRI, resulting in an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.81 [95% CI 0.73 - 0.87] for consistency and 0.78 [95% CI 0.66 - 0.86] for absolute agreement. In conclusion, we developed an algorithm to measure mammographic lesion volume that reached excellent reliability and good validity, when using MRI as ground truth.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑