arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2308.03471cs.CV

深度伪造检测:一项比较分析

Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Analysis

SFI-MediaFutures, University of Bergen(卑尔根大学SFI媒体未来研究中心);University of Bergen(卑尔根大学)

Sohail Ahmed Khan, Duc-Tien Dang-Nguyen

AI总结:

本文比较了有监督与自监督模型在四个深度伪造基准上的检测性能,分析泛化能力、数据增强影响及模型规模与性能的权衡,为构建更可靠的检测系统提供指导。

摘要:

本文对用于深度伪造检测的有监督模型和自监督模型进行了全面的比较分析。我们在四个基准数据集(FakeAVCeleb、CelebDF-V2、DFDC 和 FaceForensics++)上评估了八种有监督深度学习架构和两种使用自监督策略(DINO、CLIP)预训练的基于 Transformer 的模型。我们的分析包括数据集内评估和跨数据集评估,考察了表现最佳的模型、泛化能力以及数据增强的影响。我们还研究了模型规模与性能之间的权衡。我们的主要目标是深入理解不同深度学习架构(Transformer、CNN)、训练策略(有监督、自监督)以及深度伪造检测基准的有效性。这些见解有助于指导开发更准确、更可靠的深度伪造检测系统,这对于减轻深度伪造对个人和社会的有害影响至关重要。

英文摘要:

This paper present a comprehensive comparative analysis of supervised and self-supervised models for deepfake detection. We evaluate eight supervised deep learning architectures and two transformer-based models pre-trained using self-supervised strategies (DINO, CLIP) on four benchmarks (FakeAVCeleb, CelebDF-V2, DFDC, and FaceForensics++). Our analysis includes intra-dataset and inter-dataset evaluations, examining the best performing models, generalisation capabilities, and impact of augmentations. We also investigate the trade-off between model size and performance. Our main goal is to provide insights into the effectiveness of different deep learning architectures (transformers, CNNs), training strategies (supervised, self-supervised), and deepfake detection benchmarks. These insights can help guide the development of more accurate and reliable deepfake detection systems, which are crucial in mitigating the harmful impact of deepfakes on individuals and society.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑