arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2503.08055cs.CV

超越深度伪造与真实:在开集范式下的人脸深度伪造检测

Beyond Deepfake vs Real: Facial Deepfake Detection in the Open-Set Paradigm

The University of Melbourne(墨尔本大学);National University of Singapore(新加坡国立大学)

Nadarasar Bahavan, Sachith Seneviratne, Sanjay Saha, Ken Chen, Sanka Rasnayaka, Saman Halgamuge

AI总结:

本文提出基于监督对比学习的开集深度伪造分类算法,旨在提升对新兴深度伪造技术的检测能力,通过FaceForensics++数据集验证,实现领先性能。

摘要:

人脸伪造方法如深度伪造可用于身份操控和传播虚假信息。随着生成式AI的发展,新的更复杂的伪造技术不断出现,与现有“已知”方法有所偏离。传统深度伪造检测方法使用闭集范式,限制了检测非训练数据集方法生成的伪造物的能力。本文提出从闭集范式转向开集范式。在开集范式中,模型不仅识别已知人脸伪造方法生成的图像,还识别和标记由先前未知方法生成的图像为“未知”而非真实或伪造。本文提出基于监督对比学习的开集深度伪造分类算法。开集范式用于我们的模型使其能够更稳健地处理新兴和未见的深度伪造技术,提高可靠性和置信度,并补充法医学分析。在开集范式中,我们识别三个组别,包括既不被视为已知深度伪造也不视为真实的“未知”组别。我们研究深度伪造开集分类在三个场景中的应用:将未知方法生成的深度伪造识别为非真实,区分真实图像与深度伪造,以及分类已知方法生成的深度伪造,使用FaceForensics++数据集作为基准。我们的方法在前两个任务中实现了最先进的结果,在第三个任务中实现了具有竞争力的结果。

英文摘要:

Facial forgery methods such as deepfakes can be misused for identity manipulation and spreading misinformation. They have evolved alongside advancements in generative AI, leading to new and more sophisticated forgery techniques that diverge from existing ``known" methods. Conventional deepfake detection methods use the closed-set paradigm, thus limiting their applicability to detecting forgeries created using methods that are not part of the training dataset. In this paper, we propose a shift from the closed-set paradigm for deepfake detection. In the open-set paradigm, models are designed not only to identify images created by known facial forgery methods but also to identify and flag those produced by previously unknown methods as `unknown' and not as unforged or real or nmanipulated. In this paper, we propose an open-set deepfake classification algorithm based on supervised contrastive learning. The open-set paradigm used in our model allows it to function as a more robust tool capable of handling emerging and unseen deepfake techniques, enhancing reliability and confidence, and complementing forensic analysis. In the open-set paradigm, we identify three groups, including the `unknown' group that is neither considered a known deepfake nor real. We investigate deepfake open-set classification across three scenarios: classifying deepfakes from unknown methods not as real, distinguishing real images from deepfakes, and classifying deepfakes from known methods, using the FaceForensics++ dataset as a benchmark. Our method achieves state-of-the-art results in the first two tasks and competitive results in the third task.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑