arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2307.03217cs.LGstat.ML

使用对抗模型量化不确定性

Quantification of Uncertainty with Adversarial Models

ELLIS Unit Linz(林茨ELLIS单元);LIT AI Lab(LIT人工智能实验室);Institute for Machine Learning(机器学习研究所);Johannes Kepler University Linz(林茨约翰内斯·开普勒大学)

Kajetan Schweighofer, Lukas Aichberger, Mykyta Ielanskyi, Günter Klambauer, Sepp Hochreiter

AI总结:

提出QUAM方法通过识别积分下乘积较大的区域来更好地估计认知不确定性,其利用对抗模型在深度学习视觉任务中优于Deep Ensembles和MC dropout等现有方法。

摘要:

量化不确定性对于现实世界应用中可操作的预测非常重要。预测不确定性量化的一个关键部分是估计认知不确定性,它被定义为散度函数与后验分布乘积的积分。当前的方法如 Deep Ensembles 或 MC dropout 在估计认知不确定性方面表现不佳,因为它们在采样模型时主要考虑后验分布。我们建议使用 Quantification of Uncertainty with Adversarial Models (QUAM) 来更好地估计认知不确定性。QUAM 识别积分下整个乘积较大的区域,而不仅仅是后验分布。因此,与以前的方法相比,QUAM 对认知不确定性的近似误差更低。乘积较大的模型对应于对抗模型(不是对抗样本!)。对抗模型既具有高后验分布,又在其预测与参考模型的预测之间存在高散度。我们的实验表明,QUAM 在捕获深度学习模型的认知不确定性方面表现出色,并在视觉领域的挑战性任务中优于以前的方法。

英文摘要:

Quantifying uncertainty is important for actionable predictions in real-world applications. A crucial part of predictive uncertainty quantification is the estimation of epistemic uncertainty, which is defined as an integral of the product between a divergence function and the posterior. Current methods such as Deep Ensembles or MC dropout underperform at estimating the epistemic uncertainty, since they primarily consider the posterior when sampling models. We suggest Quantification of Uncertainty with Adversarial Models (QUAM) to better estimate the epistemic uncertainty. QUAM identifies regions where the whole product under the integral is large, not just the posterior. Consequently, QUAM has lower approximation error of the epistemic uncertainty compared to previous methods. Models for which the product is large correspond to adversarial models (not adversarial examples!). Adversarial models have both a high posterior as well as a high divergence between their predictions and that of a reference model. Our experiments show that QUAM excels in capturing epistemic uncertainty for deep learning models and outperforms previous methods on challenging tasks in the vision domain.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑