arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2307.01599q-fin.PMcs.LG

一种基于链上数据的可扩展强化学习系统用于加密货币投资组合管理

A Scalable Reinforcement Learning-based System Using On-Chain Data for Cryptocurrency Portfolio Management

University of Tsukuba(筑波大学)

Zhenhan Huang, Fumihide Tanaka

AI总结:

本文提出融合链上数据的强化学习系统CryptoRLPM,实现端到端加密货币投资组合管理,并通过可扩展架构和逐币种指标筛选,在多个收益指标上显著超越基线。

摘要:

区块链网络的链上数据(指标)类似于公司基本面,为网络提供了关键且全面的洞察。尽管链上数据具有信息价值,但尚未被用于基于强化学习(RL)的加密货币(crypto)投资组合管理(PM)系统中。一个引人关注的问题是,与基线相比,利用链上数据能在多大程度上提升基于RL系统的收益表现。因此,在本研究中,我们提出了CryptoRLPM,这是一种新颖的基于RL的系统,融合链上数据用于端到端的加密货币投资组合管理。CryptoRLPM由五个单元组成,涵盖从信息理解到交易订单执行的全过程。在CryptoRLPM中,针对每种加密货币对链上数据进行测试和指定,以解决指标无效性的问题。此外,CryptoRLPM的可扩展特性允许随时更改投资组合中的加密货币。对三个投资组合的回测结果表明,CryptoRLPM在累计收益率(ARR)、日收益率(DRR)和索提诺比率(SR)方面均优于所有基线。特别是,与比特币相比,CryptoRLPM将ARR、DRR和SR分别提升了至少83.14%、0.5603%和2.1767。

英文摘要:

On-chain data (metrics) of blockchain networks, akin to company fundamentals, provide crucial and comprehensive insights into the networks. Despite their informative nature, on-chain data have not been utilized in reinforcement learning (RL)-based systems for cryptocurrency (crypto) portfolio management (PM). An intriguing subject is the extent to which the utilization of on-chain data can enhance an RL-based system's return performance compared to baselines. Therefore, in this study, we propose CryptoRLPM, a novel RL-based system incorporating on-chain data for end-to-end crypto PM. CryptoRLPM consists of five units, spanning from information comprehension to trading order execution. In CryptoRLPM, the on-chain data are tested and specified for each crypto to solve the issue of ineffectiveness of metrics. Moreover, the scalable nature of CryptoRLPM allows changes in the portfolios' cryptos at any time. Backtesting results on three portfolios indicate that CryptoRLPM outperforms all the baselines in terms of accumulated rate of return (ARR), daily rate of return (DRR), and Sortino ratio (SR). Particularly, when compared to Bitcoin, CryptoRLPM enhances the ARR, DRR, and SR by at least 83.14%, 0.5603%, and 2.1767 respectively.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑