arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2306.05751cs.LGstat.ME
收藏

通过非线性分位数回归推进反事实推断

Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression

Carnegie Mellon University(卡内基梅隆大学);University of California San Diego(加利福尼亚大学圣迭戈分校);Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence(穆罕默德·本·扎耶德人工智能大学);The University of Sydney(悉尼大学)

Shaoan Xie, Biwei Huang, Bin Gu, Tongliang Liu, Kun Zhang

AI总结:

本文将反事实推断重构为扩展的非线性分位数回归问题,提出神经网络与双层优化框架,仅依赖观测数据和定性因果结构即可推断反事实结果,并给出泛化误差上界及优于现有方法的实证结果。

摘要:

回答反事实“如果……会怎样”问题的能力,对于理解和利用因果影响至关重要。在 Pearl 的反事实框架下,传统反事实推断通常依赖于能够获取或估计一个结构因果模型。然而在实践中,该因果模型往往未知,并且可能难以识别。因此,本文旨在仅基于观测数据和(学习到的)定性因果结构开展可靠的反事实推断,而无需预定义因果模型,甚至无需直接估计条件分布。为此,我们建立了反事实推断与分位数回归之间的一种新联系,并证明反事实推断可以被重新表述为一个扩展的分位数回归问题。基于这一洞见,我们提出了一个实用框架,用于在双层优化方案下利用神经网络实现高效且有效的反事实推断。所提方法增强了将估计的反事实结果泛化到未见数据的能力,从而给出了泛化误差的上界。此外,实证证据表明,与现有方法相比,其具有更优的统计效率。在多个数据集上进行的实证结果为我们的理论论断提供了有力支持。

英文摘要:

The capacity to address counterfactual "what if" inquiries is crucial for understanding and making use of causal influences. Traditional counterfactual inference, under Pearls' counterfactual framework, typically depends on having access to or estimating a structural causal model. Yet, in practice, this causal model is often unknown and might be challenging to identify. Hence, this paper aims to perform reliable counterfactual inference based solely on observational data and the (learned) qualitative causal structure, without necessitating a predefined causal model or even direct estimations of conditional distributions. To this end, we establish a novel connection between counterfactual inference and quantile regression and show that counterfactual inference can be reframed as an extended quantile regression problem. Building on this insight, we propose a practical framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks under a bi-level optimization scheme. The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data, thereby providing an upper bound on the generalization error. Furthermore, empirical evidence demonstrates its superior statistical efficiency in comparison to existing methods. Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑