arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2305.03478physics.space-ph
收藏

地球磁层的1年期GUMICS-4模拟结果与Cluster卫星测量结果的比较

Comparing 1-year GUMICS-4 simulations of the Terrestrial Magnetosphere with Cluster Measurements

Gabor Facsko, David Sibeck, Ilja Honkonen, Jozsef Bor, German Farinas Perez, Aniko Timar, Yuri Shprits, Pyry Peitso, Laura Degener, Eija Tanskanen, Chandrasekha… 展开作者

Gabor Facsko, David Sibeck, Ilja Honkonen, Jozsef Bor, German Farinas Perez, Aniko Timar, Yuri Shprits, Pyry Peitso, Laura Degener, Eija Tanskanen, Chandrasekhar Reddy Anekallu, Sandor Szalai, Arpad Kis, Viktor Wesztergom, Akos Madar, Nikolett Biro, Gergely Koban, Andras Illyes, Peter Kovacs, Zsuzsanna Dalya, Munkhjargal Lkhagvadorj

AI总结:

本研究将GUMICS-4全球磁流体力学模型的1年期模拟结果与Cluster SC3卫星的测量数据对比,验证了模型在不同磁层区域的预测准确性,明确了各区域的预测效果差异及成因。

摘要:

我们将GUMICS-4全球磁流体力学模型针对太阳风与地球磁层相互作用的预测结果,与Cluster SC3卫星在2002年1月29日至2003年2月2日期间超过一年的测量数据进行了对比。具体而言,我们对比了模型预测值与磁强计测得的磁场南北分量(B_z)、沿日地连线的速度分量(V_x),以及由顶帽等离子体光谱仪测得的等离子体密度和电场仪器测得的航天器电势。我们选取了太阳风、磁鞘和磁层中仪器能提供高质量数据、且模型能正确预测航天器所在区域的时段开展研究。我们通过航天器测量数据确定了弓激波、磁层顶和中性片的位置,并将这些位置与模拟预测的位置进行了对比。GUMICS-4模型在太阳风区域的结果与测量值吻合良好,但在磁鞘区域的准确性较差,在磁层中的模拟结果不符合实际情况。弓激波的位置预测效果较好,而磁层顶位置的准确性稍差。由于行星际磁场的B_y分量较小的特殊太阳风条件,中性片的位置预测相当准确。

英文摘要:

We compare the predictions of the GUMICS$-$4 global magnetohydrodynamic model for the interaction of the solar wind with the Earth's magnetosphere with Cluster~SC3 measurements for over one year, from January 29, 2002, to February 2, 2003. In particular, we compare model predictions with the north/south component of the magnetic field ($B_{z}$) seen by the magnetometer, the component of the velocity along the Sun-Earth line ($V_{x}$), and the plasma density as determined from a top hat plasma spectrometer and the spacecraft's potential from the electric field instrument. We select intervals in the solar wind, the magnetosheath, and the magnetosphere where these instruments provided good-quality data, and the model correctly predicted the region in which the spacecraft is located. We determine the location of the bow shock, the magnetopause, and the neutral sheet from the spacecraft measurements and compare these locations to those predicted by the simulation. The GUMICS$-$4 model agrees well with the measurements in the solar wind however its accuracy is worse in the magnetosheath. The simulation results are not realistic in the magnetosphere. The bow shock location is predicted well, however, the magnetopause location is less accurate. The neutral sheet positions are located quite accurately thanks to the special solar wind conditions when the $B_{y}$ component of the interplanetary magnetic field is small.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑