arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2305.02012stat.MLcs.AIcs.LG

可解释人工智能方法之视角:SHAP与LIME

A Perspective on Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methods: SHAP and LIME

William Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London(伦敦玛丽女王大学威廉·哈维研究所、NIHR 巴茨生物医学研究中心);Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust(巴茨心脏中心、圣巴塞洛缪医院、巴茨健康 NHS 信托);Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester(莱斯特大学人口健康科学系);Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, University of Zakho(扎胡大学科学学院计算机科学系);Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona(维罗纳大学创新医学工程系);Health Data Research UK(英国健康数据研究所);Alan Turing Institute(艾伦·图灵研究所)

Ahmed Salih, Zahra Raisi-Estabragh, Ilaria Boscolo Galazzo, Petia Radeva, Steffen E. Petersen, Gloria Menegaz, Karim Lekadir

AI总结:

本文以生物医学案例研究探讨SHAP和LIME两种可解释人工智能方法,揭示其解释结果易受机器学习模型选择和特征共线性影响,并据此提出解释框架与使用警示。

摘要:

可解释人工智能(XAI)方法已经出现,旨在将机器学习(ML)模型的黑箱转化为更易于理解的形式。这些方法有助于传达模型的工作方式,目的是使ML模型更加透明,并提高最终用户对其输出的信任。SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP)和Local Interpretable Model Agnostic Explanation(LIME)是两种广泛使用的XAI方法,尤其是在表格数据中。在这篇观点文章中,我们讨论了这两种方法的可解释性指标是如何生成的,并提出了一个解释其输出的框架,突出它们的弱点和优势。具体而言,我们依靠来自生物医学领域的一个案例研究(对患有或不患有心肌梗死的个体进行分类),从模型依赖性和特征之间存在共线性的角度讨论了它们的结果。结果表明,SHAP和LIME高度受所采用的ML模型和特征共线性的影响,这提醒人们在使用和解释它们时需要谨慎。

英文摘要:

eXplainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods have emerged to convert the black box of machine learning (ML) models into a more digestible form. These methods help to communicate how the model works with the aim of making ML models more transparent and increasing the trust of end-users into their output. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model Agnostic Explanation (LIME) are two widely used XAI methods, particularly with tabular data. In this perspective piece, we discuss the way the explainability metrics of these two methods are generated and propose a framework for interpretation of their outputs, highlighting their weaknesses and strengths. Specifically, we discuss their outcomes in terms of model-dependency and in the presence of collinearity among the features, relying on a case study from the biomedical domain (classification of individuals with or without myocardial infarction). The results indicate that SHAP and LIME are highly affected by the adopted ML model and feature collinearity, raising a note of caution on their usage and interpretation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑