arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2408.04746cs.HCcs.AI
收藏

问题多于答案?将可解释AI集成到网络AI工具中的经验教训

More Questions than Answers? Lessons from Integrating Explainable AI into a Cyber-AI Tool

MIT Lincoln Laboratory(麻省理工学院林肯实验室)

Ashley Suh, Harry Li, Caitlin Kenney, Kenneth Alperin, Steven R. Gomez

AI总结:

本文通过网络安全源代码分类案例研究,评估XAI在分析师工作流中的可用性,指出SHAP、LIME等事后局部解释难以被非专家理解,并探讨LLMs提供高层解释的潜力。

摘要:

我们分享了在为网络安全分析师的特定领域工作流程中实施可解释AI(XAI)这一持续努力中观察到的现象和面临的挑战。具体而言,我们简要描述了一项将XAI用于源代码分类的初步案例研究,在该场景中,准确评估和及时性至关重要。我们发现,尽管最先进的显著性解释技术(例如SHAP或LIME)在营销上面向非技术用户,但当几乎不具备AI专业知识的人员解读其输出时,这些输出会在转译过程中失效。此外,我们发现,流行的XAI技术属于事后解释,且解释过于局部化,因此难以为实时人机AI工作流程提供足够洞见。相反,我们观察到,网络分析师需要更高层次、易于理解的解释,并且这些解释应尽可能少地干扰其工作流程。我们概述了实用且有效的XAI中尚未解决的空白,随后探讨了大型语言模型(LLMs)等新兴技术如何缓解这些现有障碍。

英文摘要:

We share observations and challenges from an ongoing effort to implement Explainable AI (XAI) in a domain-specific workflow for cybersecurity analysts. Specifically, we briefly describe a preliminary case study on the use of XAI for source code classification, where accurate assessment and timeliness are paramount. We find that the outputs of state-of-the-art saliency explanation techniques (e.g., SHAP or LIME) are lost in translation when interpreted by people with little AI expertise, despite these techniques being marketed for non-technical users. Moreover, we find that popular XAI techniques offer fewer insights for real-time human-AI workflows when they are post hoc and too localized in their explanations. Instead, we observe that cyber analysts need higher-level, easy-to-digest explanations that can offer as little disruption as possible to their workflows. We outline unaddressed gaps in practical and effective XAI, then touch on how emerging technologies like Large Language Models (LLMs) could mitigate these existing obstacles.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑