arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2303.08994eess.SYcs.LGcs.SY

物理信息神经网络用于时域仿真:精度、计算成本与灵活性

Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Time-Domain Simulations: Accuracy, Computational Cost, and Flexibility

Technical University of Denmark(丹麦技术大学)

Jochen Stiasny, Spyros Chatzivasileiadis

AI总结:

本文研究物理信息神经网络(PINNs)在电力系统动态仿真中的应用,发现其比传统求解器快10至1000倍且精度足够,并提出基于梯度正则化的dtNNs以深入分析其优劣。

摘要:

电力系统动态仿真是一项计算成本高昂的任务。考虑到发电和负荷模式日益增长的不确定性,需要持续评估数千个场景以确保电力系统的安全性。物理信息神经网络(PINNs)近期作为一种有望大幅加速非线性动力系统计算的方法而出现。本研究探讨了这些方法在电力系统动态中的应用,重点关注对负荷扰动的动态响应。将PINNs的预测与传统求解器的解进行比较,我们发现PINNs比传统求解器快10到1000倍。同时,我们发现即使在大的时间步长下,它们也足够准确且数值稳定。为了促进更深入的理解,本文还通过在损失函数中引入基于梯度的项,提出了一种新的神经网络(NN)训练正则化方法。由此产生的神经网络,我们称之为dtNNs,帮助我们全面分析基于NN的方法的优势和劣势,纳入底层物理知识如何影响NN性能,以及这与电力系统动态的传统求解器相比如何。

英文摘要:

The simulation of power system dynamics poses a computationally expensive task. Considering the growing uncertainty of generation and demand patterns, thousands of scenarios need to be continuously assessed to ensure the safety of power systems. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have recently emerged as a promising solution for drastically accelerating computations of non-linear dynamical systems. This work investigates the applicability of these methods for power system dynamics, focusing on the dynamic response to load disturbances. Comparing the prediction of PINNs to the solution of conventional solvers, we find that PINNs can be 10 to 1000 times faster than conventional solvers. At the same time, we find them to be sufficiently accurate and numerically stable even for large time steps. To facilitate a deeper understanding, this paper also present a new regularisation of Neural Network (NN) training by introducing a gradient-based term in the loss function. The resulting NNs, which we call dtNNs, help us deliver a comprehensive analysis about the strengths and weaknesses of the NN based approaches, how incorporating knowledge of the underlying physics affects NN performance, and how this compares with conventional solvers for power system dynamics.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑