arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2303.07136quant-ph
收藏

量子态层析置信区间的比较

Comparison of confidence regions for quantum state tomography

Jessica O. de Almeida, Matthias Kleinmann, Gael Sentís

AI总结:

该研究比较了量子态层析中构建置信区间的多种方法,提出操作性度量,发现方法间差异显著,最优选择取决于态制备场景。

摘要:

与未知实验制备过程相关的量子态可以通过执行量子态层析来确定。如果数据中的统计不确定性主导其他实验误差,那么层析重建过程必须表达这种不确定性。实现这一点的严格方式是通过状态空间中的统计置信区间。自然地,该区间的大小随着样本数量的增加而减小,但它也关键地取决于区间的构建方法。我们比较了近期构建置信区间的方法以及基于高斯近似的参考方法。为了进行比较,我们提出了一种操作性度量,发现方法之间存在显著差异,但哪种方法更优可能取决于态制备场景的细节。

英文摘要:

The quantum state associated to an unknown experimental preparation procedure can be determined by performing quantum state tomography. If the statistical uncertainty in the data dominates over other experimental errors, then a tomographic reconstruction procedure must express this uncertainty. A rigorous way to accomplish this is via statistical confidence regions in state space. Naturally, the size of this region decreases when increasing the number of samples, but it also depends critically on the construction method of the region. We compare recent methods for constructing confidence regions as well as a reference method based on a Gaussian approximation. For the comparison, we propose an operational measure with the finding, that there is a significant difference between methods, but which method is preferable can depend on the details of the state preparation scenario.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑