arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2303.01560cs.LGstat.ML

主动学习与贝叶斯优化:面向目标学习的统一视角

Active Learning and Bayesian Optimization: a Unified Perspective to Learn with a Goal

Politecnico di Torino(都灵理工大学);Imperial College London(帝国理工学院);Massachusetts Institute of Technology(麻省理工学院)

Francesco Di Fiore, Michela Nardelli, Laura Mainini

AI总结:

本文提出统一视角,将贝叶斯优化与主动学习形式化为由共同原则驱动的共生自适应采样方法,并通过准则映射、通用分类及基准实验揭示两者协同作用与适用边界。

摘要:

科学与工程应用通常涉及昂贵的优化问题,以识别感兴趣系统的最优设计解和状态。贝叶斯优化和主动学习通过高效的自适应采样方案计算代理模型,以辅助并加速这一朝向给定优化目标的搜索任务。这两种方法都由特定的填充/学习准则驱动,这些准则量化了在未知优化变量组合下评估目标函数相对于设定目标的效用。尽管这两个领域在过去几十年中流行度呈指数级增长,但它们的二元性与协同作用迄今为止受到的关注相对较少。本文讨论并形式化了贝叶斯优化与主动学习之间的协同作用,将其视为由共同原则驱动的共生自适应采样方法。特别地,我们通过将贝叶斯填充准则与主动学习准则之间的类比形式化,展示了这一统一视角,将其作为两类目标驱动过程的驱动原则。为了支持我们的原创观点,我们提出了一种自适应采样技术的通用分类,以突出自适应采样、主动学习和贝叶斯优化各大家族之间的相似性与差异。据此,通过将贝叶斯填充准则与主动学习准则进行映射来展示协同作用,并针对由单一信息源和多个保真度层级引导的搜索进行了形式化。此外,我们提供了应用这些学习准则的指南,考察了不同贝叶斯方案在多种基准问题上的性能,以突出其在刻画现实世界应用的数学性质上的优势与局限。

英文摘要:

Science and Engineering applications are typically associated with expensive optimization problems to identify optimal design solutions and states of the system of interest. Bayesian optimization and active learning compute surrogate models through efficient adaptive sampling schemes to assist and accelerate this search task toward a given optimization goal. Both those methodologies are driven by specific infill/learning criteria which quantify the utility with respect to the set goal of evaluating the objective function for unknown combinations of optimization variables. While the two fields have seen an exponential growth in popularity in the past decades, their dualism and synergy have received relatively little attention to date. This paper discusses and formalizes the synergy between Bayesian optimization and active learning as symbiotic adaptive sampling methodologies driven by common principles. In particular, we demonstrate this unified perspective through the formalization of the analogy between the Bayesian infill criteria and active learning criteria as driving principles of both the goal-driven procedures. To support our original perspective, we propose a general classification of adaptive sampling techniques to highlight similarities and differences between the vast families of adaptive sampling, active learning, and Bayesian optimization. Accordingly, the synergy is demonstrated mapping the Bayesian infill criteria with the active learning criteria, and is formalized for searches informed by both a single information source and multiple levels of fidelity. In addition, we provide guidelines to apply those learning criteria investigating the performance of different Bayesian schemes for a variety of benchmark problems to highlight benefits and limitations over mathematical properties that characterize real-world applications.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑