arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2003.03546cs.AIcs.LGstat.COstat.ML
收藏

对抗性机器学习:贝叶斯视角

Adversarial Machine Learning: Bayesian Perspectives

ICMAT-CSIC;CUNEF Universidad(库内夫大学);Komorebi AI Technologies(Komorebi人工智能技术公司);Harvard Medical School(哈佛医学院)

David Rios Insua, Roi Naveiro, Victor Gallego, Jason Poulos

AI总结:

本文指出AML中基于博弈论的共同知识假设不现实,提出用贝叶斯方法显式建模对手信念与利益的不确定性,以放宽假设并获得更稳健的推断,并在监督学习中加以说明。

摘要:

对抗性机器学习(AML)正在成为一个重要领域,旨在保护机器学习(ML)系统免受安全威胁:在某些场景中,可能存在主动操纵输入数据以欺骗学习系统的对手。这创造了ML系统可能面临的一类新的安全漏洞,以及一种称为对抗鲁棒性的新期望属性,它对于基于ML输出的可信操作至关重要。AML中的大多数工作都建立在学习系统与准备操纵输入数据的对手之间冲突的博弈论建模之上。这假设每个智能体都知道对手的利益和不确定性判断,从而便于基于纳什均衡进行推断。然而,这种共同知识假设在AML典型的安全场景中并不现实。在回顾了此类博弈论方法之后,我们讨论了贝叶斯视角在防御基于ML的系统时提供的好处。我们展示了贝叶斯方法如何允许我们显式地建模关于对手信念和利益的不确定性,放宽不现实的假设,并提供更稳健的推断。我们在监督学习设置中说明了这一方法,并确定了相关的未来研究问题。

英文摘要:

Adversarial Machine Learning (AML) is emerging as a major field aimed at protecting machine learning (ML) systems against security threats: in certain scenarios there may be adversaries that actively manipulate input data to fool learning systems. This creates a new class of security vulnerabilities that ML systems may face, and a new desirable property called adversarial robustness essential to trust operations based on ML outputs. Most work in AML is built upon a game-theoretic modelling of the conflict between a learning system and an adversary, ready to manipulate input data. This assumes that each agent knows their opponent's interests and uncertainty judgments, facilitating inferences based on Nash equilibria. However, such common knowledge assumption is not realistic in the security scenarios typical of AML. After reviewing such game-theoretic approaches, we discuss the benefits that Bayesian perspectives provide when defending ML-based systems. We demonstrate how the Bayesian approach allows us to explicitly model our uncertainty about the opponent's beliefs and interests, relaxing unrealistic assumptions, and providing more robust inferences. We illustrate this approach in supervised learning settings, and identify relevant future research problems.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑