arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2303.01271stat.MEstat.CO

双变量Beta分布:参数推断与诊断

Bivariate beta distribution: parameter inference and diagnostics

School of Applied Mathematics, Fundação Getulio Vargas(应用数学学院,巴西得加斯·瓦格斯基金会)

Lucas Machado Moschen, Luiz Max Carvalho

AI总结:

针对相关比例的概率建模难题,本文研究Olkin & Trikalinos(2015)提出的双变量Beta分布,给出频率学派与贝叶斯参数估计方法,讨论先验设定并开发模型诊断方法。

摘要:

相关比例出现在诸多实际应用中,由于其受约束的特性,在寻找合适的概率模型方面提出了独特挑战。双变量Beta分布是著名的Beta分布向[0,1]^2空间上相关变量的自然扩展,但其构造并不唯一。多年来,研究者提出了多种双变量Beta分布,参数数量从3个到8个甚至更多,其联合密度与分布矩的数学可处理性各有不同。本文研究了Olkin & Trikalinos(2015)提出的构造方案,该方案在参数丰富性与可处理性之间取得了平衡。我们分别以矩估计法、结合哈密顿蒙特卡洛的潜变量/数据增广的形式,给出了经典(频率学派)与贝叶斯估计方法。文中还讨论了双变量Beta分布作为先验分布的设定问题,并借助蒙特卡洛实验,在数据生成设定正确与错误的两种场景下,深入探索了模型拟合度与充足性检验诊断方法的开发。

英文摘要:

Correlated proportions appear in many real-world applications and present a unique challenge in terms of finding an appropriate probabilistic model due to their constrained nature. The bivariate beta is a natural extension of the well-known beta distribution to the space of correlated quantities on $[0, 1]^2$. Its construction is not unique, however. Over the years, many bivariate beta distributions have been proposed, ranging from three to eight or more parameters, and for which the joint density and distribution moments vary in terms of mathematical tractability. In this paper, we investigate the construction proposed by Olkin & Trikalinos (2015), which strikes a balance between parameter-richness and tractability. We provide classical (frequentist) and Bayesian approaches to estimation in the form of method-of-moments and latent variable/data augmentation coupled with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, respectively. The elicitation of bivariate beta as a prior distribution is also discussed. The development of diagnostics for checking model fit and adequacy is explored in depth with the aid of Monte Carlo experiments under both well-specified and misspecified data-generating settings. Keywords: Bayesian estimation; bivariate beta; correlated proportions; diagnostics; method of moments.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑