arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2302.14520cs.CL
收藏

大型语言模型是最先进的翻译质量评估器

Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Quality

Microsoft(微软)

Tom Kocmi, Christian Federmann

AI总结:

本文提出基于 GPT 的翻译质量评估指标 GEMBA,通过零样本提示在有/无参考译文两种模式下评估,并在 WMT22 三个语言对上验证其达到最先进系统级准确率。

摘要:

我们描述了 GEMBA,这是一种基于 GPT 的翻译质量评估指标,既可在有参考译文的情况下使用,也可在无参考译文的情况下使用。在评估中,我们聚焦于零样本提示,并根据参考译文是否可用,在两种模式下比较了四种提示变体。我们研究了九个版本的 GPT 模型,包括 ChatGPT 和 GPT-4。结果表明,我们的翻译质量评估方法仅适用于 GPT-3.5 及更大规模的模型。与 WMT22 Metrics 共享任务的结果相比,在以基于 MQM 的人工标注为参照时,我们的方法在两种模式下均取得了最先进的准确率。我们的结果在系统层面上对 WMT22 Metrics 共享任务的全部三个语言对均有效,即英译德、英译俄和中译英。这初步揭示了预训练生成式大型语言模型在翻译质量评估方面的实用性。我们公开发布了本工作所述实验使用的全部代码和提示模板,以及所有相应的评分结果,以支持外部验证和可复现性。

英文摘要:

We describe GEMBA, a GPT-based metric for assessment of translation quality, which works both with a reference translation and without. In our evaluation, we focus on zero-shot prompting, comparing four prompt variants in two modes, based on the availability of the reference. We investigate nine versions of GPT models, including ChatGPT and GPT-4. We show that our method for translation quality assessment only works with GPT~3.5 and larger models. Comparing to results from WMT22's Metrics shared task, our method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy in both modes when compared to MQM-based human labels. Our results are valid on the system level for all three WMT22 Metrics shared task language pairs, namely English into German, English into Russian, and Chinese into English. This provides a first glimpse into the usefulness of pre-trained, generative large language models for quality assessment of translations. We publicly release all our code and prompt templates used for the experiments described in this work, as well as all corresponding scoring results, to allow for external validation and reproducibility.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑