arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2302.04479quant-ph

用于低深度量子近似优化的高表达力拟设

An Expressive Ansatz for Low-Depth Quantum Approximate Optimisation

V. Vijendran, Aritra Das, Dax Enshan Koh, Syed M. Assad, Ping Koy Lam

AI总结:

本文提出QAOA的过参数化变体XQAOA,通过增加经典参数并在混合哈密顿量中引入Pauli-Y分量实现任意酉变换,在低深度下显著提升了NISQ设备上的组合优化性能。

摘要:

量子近似优化算法(QAOA)是一种混合量子-经典算法,用于近似求解组合优化问题。它包含由问题哈密顿量和混合哈密顿量组成的参数化拟设的多次迭代,其中参数通过经典方式进行优化。尽管QAOA可以在NISQ设备上实现,但物理限制会限制电路深度并降低性能。为了解决这些限制,本工作引入了eXpressive QAOA(XQAOA),它是QAOA的一种过参数化变体,通过为拟设分配更多经典参数来提升其在低深度下的性能。XQAOA还在混合哈密顿量中引入了额外的Pauli-Y分量,使得混合器能够在每个量子比特上实现任意的酉变换。为了在单位深度下对XQAOA的性能进行基准测试,我们推导了其在MaxCut问题上的闭式表达式,并在一组节点数为128和256、度数从3到10的不加权正则图上,将其与QAOA、Multi-Angle QAOA(MA-QAOA)、一种经典松弛算法以及最先进的Goemans-Williamson算法进行了比较。我们的结果表明,在单位深度下,XQAOA具有良性的损失景观,使其在所有图实例上均能持续优于QAOA、MA-QAOA和经典松弛算法,并且在度数大于4的图实例上优于Goemans-Williamson算法。小规模模拟还表明,单位深度的XQAOA在高达五的所有测试深度上均超越了QAOA和MA-QAOA。此外,我们发现了一族无限图,XQAOA能精确求解其MaxCut问题,并解析地证明,对于该族中的某些图,XQAOA实现了比QAOA大得多的近似比。总体而言,XQAOA是NISQ设备上变分量子优化的更可行选择,在低深度下提供了有竞争力的性能。

英文摘要:

The quantum approximate optimisation algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm used to approximately solve combinatorial optimisation problems. It involves multiple iterations of a parameterised ansatz comprising a problem and mixer Hamiltonian, with the parameters being classically optimised. While QAOA can be implemented on NISQ devices, physical limitations can limit circuit depth and decrease performance. To address these limitations, this work introduces the eXpressive QAOA (XQAOA), an overparameterised variant of QAOA that assigns more classical parameters to the ansatz to improve its performance at low depths. XQAOA also introduces an additional Pauli-Y component in the mixer Hamiltonian, allowing the mixer to implement arbitrary unitary transformations on each qubit. To benchmark the performance of XQAOA at unit depth, we derive its closed-form expression for the MaxCut problem and compare it to QAOA, Multi-Angle QAOA (MA-QAOA), a classical-relaxed algorithm, and the state-of-the-art Goemans-Williamson algorithm on a set of unweighted regular graphs with 128 and 256 nodes for degrees ranging from 3 to 10. Our results indicate that at unit depth, XQAOA has benign loss landscapes, allowing it to consistently outperform QAOA, MA-QAOA, and the classical-relaxed algorithm on all graph instances and the Goemans-Williamson algorithm on graph instances with degrees greater than 4. Small-scale simulations also reveal that unit-depth XQAOA surpasses both QAOA and MA-QAOA on all tested depths up to five. Additionally, we find an infinite family of graphs for which XQAOA solves MaxCut exactly and analytically show that for some graphs in this family, XQAOA achieves a much larger approximation ratio than QAOA. Overall, XQAOA is a more viable choice for variational quantum optimisation on NISQ devices, offering competitive performance at low depths.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑