We consider the problem of answering observational, interventional, and counterfactual queries in a causally sufficient setting where only observational data and the causal graph are available. Utilizing the recent developments in diffusion models, we introduce diffusion-based causal models (DCM) to learn causal mechanisms, that generate unique latent encodings. These encodings enable us to directly sample under interventions and perform abduction for counterfactuals. Diffusion models are a natural fit here, since they can encode each node to a latent representation that acts as a proxy for exogenous noise. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate significant improvements over existing state-of-the-art methods for answering causal queries. Furthermore, we provide theoretical results that offer a methodology for analyzing counterfactual estimation in general encoder-decoder models, which could be useful in settings beyond our proposed approach.
Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems（马克斯·普朗克智能系统研究所）；Saarland University（萨尔大学）
In this paper, we introduce VACA, a novel class of variational graph autoencoders for causal inference in the absence of hidden confounders, when only observational data and the causal graph are available. Without making any parametric assumptions, VACA mimics the necessary properties of a Structural Causal Model (SCM) to provide a flexible and practical framework for approximating interventions (do-operator) and abduction-action-prediction steps. As a result, and as shown by our empirical results, VACA accurately approximates the interventional and counterfactual distributions on diverse SCMs…
Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, UCL（伦敦大学学院盖茨比计算神经科学单元）；University of Helsinki（赫尔辛基大学）
We posit that autoregressive flow models are well-suited to performing a range of causal inference tasks - ranging from causal discovery to making interventional and counterfactual predictions. In particular, we exploit the fact that autoregressive architectures define an ordering over variables, analogous to a causal ordering, in order to propose a single flow architecture to perform all three aforementioned tasks. We first leverage the fact that flow models estimate normalized log-densities of data to derive a bivariate measure of causal direction based on likelihood ratios. Whilst tradition…
Causal discovery from empirical data is a fundamental problem in many scientific domains. Observational data allows for identifiability only up to Markov equivalence class. In this paper we first propose a polynomial time algorithm for learning the exact correctly-oriented structure of the transitive reduction of any causal Bayesian network with high probability, by using interventional path queries. Each path query takes as input an origin node and a target node, and answers whether there is a directed path from the origin to the target. This is done by intervening on the origin node and obse…
Gatsby Unit, UCL（伦敦大学学院盖茨比单元）；King’s College London（伦敦国王学院）；University of Helsinki（赫尔辛基大学）
Two apparently unrelated fields -- normalizing flows and causality -- have recently received considerable attention in the machine learning community. In this work, we highlight an intrinsic correspondence between a simple family of autoregressive normalizing flows and identifiable causal models. We exploit the fact that autoregressive flow architectures define an ordering over variables, analogous to a causal ordering, to show that they are well-suited to performing a range of causal inference tasks, ranging from causal discovery to making interventional and counterfactual predictions. First,…
University of California, Santa Barbara（加州大学圣巴巴拉分校）
Although deep learning models have driven state-of-the-art performance on a wide array of tasks, they are prone to spurious correlations that should not be learned as predictive clues. To mitigate this problem, we propose a causality-based training framework to reduce the spurious correlations caused by observed confounders. We give theoretical analysis on the underlying general Structural Causal Model (SCM) and propose to perform Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) on the interventional distribution instead of the observational distribution, namely Counterfactual Maximum Likelihood Estimation…
DoFlow: Flow-based Generative Models for Interventional and Counterfactual Forecasting on Time Series
H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering（H. Milton Stewart工业与系统工程学院）；Georgia Institute of Technology（佐治亚理工学院）；Northwestern–Argonne Institute for Scientific and Engineering Excellence（西北-阿贡科学与工程卓越研究所）
Robust Root Cause Diagnosis using In-Distribution Interventions
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay（印度理工学院孟买分校）；International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad（国际信息技术学院海得拉巴分校）；Microsoft Research India（微软研究院印度分部）
Extended Wasserstein-GAN Approach to Causal Distribution Learning: Density-Free Estimation and Minimax Optimality
The University of Tokyo（东京大学）；Japan Institute for Health Security（日本健康安全研究所）；RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project（理化学研究所先进情报项目）；Kyoto University（京都大学）
Massachusetts Institute of Technology（麻省理工学院）；Microsoft Research（微软研究院）
Recent advances in probabilistic generative modeling have motivated learning Structural Causal Models (SCM) from observational datasets using deep conditional generative models, also known as Deep Structural Causal Models (DSCM). If successful, DSCMs can be utilized for causal estimation tasks, e.g., for answering counterfactual queries. In this work, we warn practitioners about non-identifiability of counterfactual inference from observational data, even in the absence of unobserved confounding and assuming known causal structure. We prove counterfactual identifiability of monotonic generatio…
UC San Diego（加州大学圣地亚哥分校）；Maternity Foundation（产妇基金会）
Mobile health apps provide a unique means of collecting data that can be used to deliver adaptive interventions.The predicted outcomes considerably influence the selection of such interventions. Recourse via counterfactuals provides tangible mechanisms to modify user predictions. By identifying plausible actions that increase the likelihood of a desired prediction, stakeholders are afforded agency over their predictions. Furthermore, recourse mechanisms enable counterfactual reasoning that can help provide insights into candidates for causal interventional features. We demonstrate the feasibil…
Technion（以色列理工学院）；Google Research（谷歌研究院）；University of Toronto（多伦多大学）；Vector Institute（向量研究所）
To perform counterfactual reasoning in Structural Causal Models (SCMs), one needs to know the causal mechanisms, which provide factorizations of conditional distributions into noise sources and deterministic functions mapping realizations of noise to samples. Unfortunately, the causal mechanism is not uniquely identified by data that can be gathered by observing and interacting with the world, so there remains the question of how to choose causal mechanisms. In recent work, Oberst & Sontag (2019) propose Gumbel-max SCMs, which use Gumbel-max reparameterizations as the causal mechanism due to a…
Causal inference quantifies cause-effect relationships by estimating counterfactual parameters from data. This entails using \emph{identification theory} to establish a link between counterfactual parameters of interest and distributions from which data is available. A line of work characterized non-parametric identification for a wide variety of causal parameters in terms of the \emph{observed data distribution}. More recently, identification results have been extended to settings where experimental data from interventional distributions is also available. In this paper, we use Single World I…
TU Graz（格拉茨技术大学）；ETH Zürich（苏黎世联邦理工学院）；MPI for Intelligent Systems（马克斯·普朗克智能系统研究所）；University of Cambridge（剑桥大学）
Causal discovery and causal reasoning are classically treated as separate and consecutive tasks: one first infers the causal graph, and then uses it to estimate causal effects of interventions. However, such a two-stage approach is uneconomical, especially in terms of actively collected interventional data, since the causal query of interest may not require a fully-specified causal model. From a Bayesian perspective, it is also unnatural, since a causal query (e.g., the causal graph or some causal effect) can be viewed as a latent quantity subject to posterior inference -- other unobserved qua…
Discovering causal models from observational and interventional data is an important first step preceding what-if analysis or counterfactual reasoning. As has been shown before, the direction of pairwise causal relations can, under certain conditions, be inferred from observational data via standard gradient-boosted classifiers (GBC) using carefully engineered statistical features. In this paper we apply deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to this problem by plotting attribute pairs as 2-D scatter plots that are fed to the CNN as images. We evaluate our approach on the 'Cause- Effect Pai…
ACTIVA: Amortized Causal Effect Estimation via Transformer-based Variational Autoencoder
Learning and Reasoning Group（学习与推理组）；Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam（阿姆斯特丹自由大学）；Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science (LIACS)（莱顿先进计算机科学研究所）；Leiden University（莱顿大学）；Informatics Institute & Institute for Logic, Language and Computation（信息研究所及逻辑、语言与计算研究所）；University of Amsterdam（阿姆斯特丹大学）
Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems（马克斯·普朗克智能系统研究所）；Max Planck ETH Center for Learning Systems（马克斯·普朗克-ETH学习系统中心）；University of Cambridge（剑桥大学）；Saarland University（萨尔兰大学）
Recent work has discussed the limitations of counterfactual explanations to recommend actions for algorithmic recourse, and argued for the need of taking causal relationships between features into consideration. Unfortunately, in practice, the true underlying structural causal model is generally unknown. In this work, we first show that it is impossible to guarantee recourse without access to the true structural equations. To address this limitation, we propose two probabilistic approaches to select optimal actions that achieve recourse with high probability given limited causal knowledge (e.g…
Imperial College London（帝国理工学院）；Microsoft Research（微软研究院）
Causal reasoning provides a language to ask important interventional and counterfactual questions beyond purely statistical association. In medical imaging, for example, we may want to study the causal effect of genetic, environmental, or lifestyle factors on the normal and pathological variation of anatomical phenotypes. However, while anatomical shape models of 3D surface meshes, extracted from automated image segmentation, can be reliably constructed, there is a lack of computational tooling to enable causal reasoning about morphological variations. To tackle this problem, we propose deep s…
InfluenceField: A Differentiable Field with Interventionally Identifiable Causal Structure for Multimodal World Modeling
Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford（牛津大学数学研究所）；Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford（牛津大学计算机科学系）；School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham Ningbo China（宁波诺丁汉大学数学科学学院）
UC San Diego（加州大学圣迭戈分校）；AWS AI, Amazon（亚马逊云科技人工智能）
Controllable text generation concerns two fundamental tasks of wide applications, namely generating text of given attributes (i.e., attribute-conditional generation), and minimally editing existing text to possess desired attributes (i.e., text attribute transfer). Extensive prior work has largely studied the two problems separately, and developed different conditional models which, however, are prone to producing biased text (e.g., various gender stereotypes). This paper proposes to formulate controllable text generation from a principled causal perspective which models the two tasks with a u…
The unit selection problem aims to identify objects, called units, that are most likely to exhibit a desired mode of behavior when subjected to stimuli (e.g., customers who are about to churn but would change their mind if encouraged). Unit selection with counterfactual objective functions was introduced relatively recently with existing work focusing on bounding a specific class of objective functions, called the benefit functions, based on observational and interventional data -- assuming a fully specified model is not available to evaluate these functions. We complement this line of work by…
Causal analysis may be affected by selection bias, which is defined as the systematic exclusion of data from a certain subpopulation. Previous work in this area focused on the derivation of identifiability conditions. We propose instead a first algorithm to address both identifiable and unidentifiable queries. We prove that, in spite of the missingness induced by the selection bias, the likelihood of the available data is unimodal. This enables us to use the causal expectation-maximisation scheme to obtain the values of causal queries in the identifiable case, and to compute bounds otherwise. …
