arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2302.00546cs.SIcs.CY

你是一个机器人!——研究 Twitter 上机器人指控的发展

You are a Bot! -- Studying the Development of Bot Accusations on Twitter

Dennis Assenmacher, Leon Fröhling, Claudia Wagner

AI总结:

本文首次大规模研究 Twitter 上的机器人指控,发现“机器人”一词主要被用于否定对话者的人性而非准确识别自动化账号,因此不应将此类指控作为训练或测试机器人检测模型的可靠信号。

摘要:

过去十年间,对机器人账号的特征刻画与检测,以及它们被认为操纵社交媒体平台社会的能力,一直是大量研究的主题。在缺乏真实标签数据(即由专家标注为机器人或自我声明自动化性质的账号)的情况下,对机器人特征刻画与检测感兴趣的研究者可能希望借助群体智慧。但是,需要多少人指控另一个用户是机器人,我们才能假定该账号很可能是自动化的?更重要的是,社交媒体上的机器人指控究竟是否是检测机器人的有效信号?我们的研究首次对 Twitter 上的机器人指控进行了大规模研究,并展示了“机器人”一词如何成为社交媒体对话中非人化的工具,因为它主要被用来否定对话伙伴的人性。因此,社交媒体上的机器人指控不应被天真地用作训练或测试机器人检测模型的信号。

英文摘要:

The characterization and detection of bots with their presumed ability to manipulate society on social media platforms have been subject to many research endeavors over the last decade. In the absence of ground truth data (i.e., accounts that are labeled as bots by experts or self-declare their automated nature), researchers interested in the characterization and detection of bots may want to tap into the wisdom of the crowd. But how many people need to accuse another user as a bot before we can assume that the account is most likely automated? And more importantly, are bot accusations on social media at all a valid signal for the detection of bots? Our research presents the first large-scale study of bot accusations on Twitter and shows how the term bot became an instrument of dehumanization in social media conversations since it is predominantly used to deny the humanness of conversation partners. Consequently, bot accusations on social media should not be naively used as a signal to train or test bot detection models.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑