arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2212.04652quant-phphysics.atom-ph
收藏

通过相关光谱法在$10^{-18}$水平上进行$^{176}$ Lu PDMATHAAB时钟比较

$^{176}$Lu$^+$ clock comparison at the $10^{-18}$ level via correlation spectroscopy

Zhang Zhiqiang, Kyle J. Arnold, Rattakorn Kaewuam, M. D. Barrett

摘要:

我们实验证明了两个$^{176}$卢$^+$频率参考使用相关光谱之间的协议。通过在不同磁场下的比较,我们得到了二次塞曼系数$-4.89264(88)\,\mathrm{Hz/mT^2}$,它给出了相应的分数频率不确定度贡献仅为$2.5\times 10^{-20}$,用于在0.1\,mT的典型工作磁场下的比较。随后在0.1mT下与两个系统进行比较,证明分数频率差为$(-2.0\pm(3.7)_\mathrm{stat}\pm(0.9)_\mathrm{sys})\times10^{-18}$,其中“stat”和“sys”分别表示统计和系统不确定性。

英文摘要:

We experimentally demonstrate agreement between two $^{176}$Lu$^+$ frequency references using correlation spectroscopy. From a comparison at different magnetic fields, we obtain a quadratic Zeeman coefficient of $-4.89264(88)\,\mathrm{Hz/mT^2}$, which gives a corresponding fractional frequency uncertainty contribution of just $2.5\times 10^{-20}$ for comparisons at typical operating fields of 0.1\,mT. A subsequent comparison with both systems at 0.1\,mT, demonstrates a fractional frequency difference of $(-2.0\pm(3.7)_\mathrm{stat}\pm(0.9)_\mathrm{sys})\times10^{-18}$, where `stat' and `sys' indicate statistical and systematic uncertainty, respectively.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑