arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2212.04641hep-ph
收藏

重新审视$D$介子twist-2, 3分布振幅

Revisiting $D$-meson twist-2, 3 distribution amplitudes

Tao Zhong, Dong Huang, Hai-Bing Fu

AI总结:

本文重新审视了$D$介子twist-2, 3分布振幅,提出了新的$ξ$-矩求和规则公式,并改进了光锥谐振子模型,利用最小二乘法拟合参数以获得更准确的分布振幅行为。

摘要:

由于半轻子衰变$B\to D\ell\barν_{\ell}$的$\mathcal{R}(D)$值在实验测量与标准模型(SM)理论预测之间存在显著差异,人们推测这可能是超出SM的新物理的证据。通常,在使用微扰QCD因子化和光锥QCD求和规则研究$B\to D\ell\barν_{\ell}$时,$D$介子twist-2, 3分布振幅(DAs)$ϕ_{2;D}(x,μ)$、$ϕ_{3;D}^p(x,μ)$和$ϕ_{3;D}^σ(x,μ)$是主要的误差来源。因此,获得这些DAs更合理和准确的行为非常重要。受我们之前关于π介子leading-twist DA的工作[Phys. Rev. D 104, no.1, 016021 (2021)]的启发,我们重新审视了$D$介子twist-2, 3 DAs $ϕ_{2;D}(x,μ)$、$ϕ_{3;D}^p(x,μ)$和$ϕ_{3;D}^σ(x,μ)$。提出了这三种DAs的$ξ$-矩的新求和规则公式,以获得更准确的值。改进了这些DAs的光锥谐振子模型,并通过用最小二乘法拟合$ξ$-矩的值确定了其模型参数。

英文摘要:

Due to the significant difference between the experimental measurements and the theoretical predictions of standard model (SM) for the value of $\mathcal{R}(D)$ of the semileptonic decay $B\to D\ell\barν_{\ell}$, people speculate that it may be the evidence of new physics beyond the SM. Usually, the $D$-meson twist-2, 3 distribution amplitudes (DAs) $ϕ_{2;D}(x,μ)$, $ϕ_{3;D}^p(x,μ)$ and $ϕ_{3;D}^σ(x,μ)$ are the main error sources when using perturbative QCD factorization and light-cone QCD sum rules to study $B\to D\ell\barν_{\ell}$. Therefore, it is important to get more reasonable and accurate behaviors for those DAs. Motivated by our previous work [Phys. Rev. D 104, no.1, 016021 (2021)] on pionic leading-twist DA, we revisit $D$-meson twist-2, 3 DAs $ϕ_{2;D}(x,μ)$, $ϕ_{3;D}^p(x,μ)$ and $ϕ_{3;D}^σ(x,μ)$. New sum rules formulae for the $ξ$-moments of these three DAs are suggested to obtain more accurate values. The light-cone harmonic oscillator models for those DAs are improved, and whose model parameters are determined by fitting the values of $ξ$-moments with the least squares method.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑