arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2212.03473stat.ME

用于可观测治疗异质性下优效性决策的贝叶斯多层多变量逻辑回归

Bayesian multilevel multivariate logistic regression for superiority decision-making under observable treatment heterogeneity

Xynthia Kavelaars, Joris Mulder, Maurits Kaptein

AI总结:

针对多层、多因变量且存在治疗异质性的研究数据,提出贝叶斯多层多变量逻辑回归模型,可控制I类错误率、实现亚群信息共享,聚类较多时检验效能优于单层模型。

摘要:

在医学、社会与行为研究中,我们常会遇到具有多层结构且包含多个相关因变量的数据集。这类数据通常采集自某一研究人群,该人群可划分为多个亚群,不同亚群的干预效应存在差异(即具有异质性)。尽管此类数据十分常见,但对应的分析方法却相对匮乏,研究者往往只能选择忽略多层结构和/或异质性结构、仅分析单个因变量,或是结合使用这些简化策略。这些分析策略均存在不足:忽略多层结构会抬高I类错误率,而忽视多变量或异质性结构则会掩盖深层次的研究洞见。为全面分析这类数据,本文提出了一种全新的贝叶斯多层多变量逻辑回归模型。该模型考虑了多层数据的聚类结构,使得后验推断能够在准确的错误率下开展。此外,模型在估计平均多变量治疗效应与条件平均多变量治疗效应时,可实现不同亚群间的信息共享。为便于解释,模型将多变量逻辑回归参数转换为后验成功概率及其差值。数值评估将我们的框架与不够全面的替代方法进行了对比,凸显了对多层结构建模的必要性:基于多层模型的治疗比较可达到目标I类错误率,而单层替代方法会导致I类错误膨胀。此外,当聚类数量较多时,多层模型的检验效能优于单层模型。

英文摘要:

In medical, social, and behavioral research we often encounter datasets with a multilevel structure and multiple correlated dependent variables. These data are frequently collected from a study population that distinguishes several subpopulations with different (i.e., heterogeneous) effects of an intervention. Despite the frequent occurrence of such data, methods to analyze them are less common and researchers often resort to either ignoring the multilevel and/or heterogeneous structure, analyzing only a single dependent variable, or a combination of these. These analysis strategies are suboptimal: Ignoring multilevel structures inflates Type I error rates, while neglecting the multivariate or heterogeneous structure masks detailed insights. To analyze such data comprehensively, the current paper presents a novel Bayesian multilevel multivariate logistic regression model. The clustered structure of multilevel data is taken into account, such that posterior inferences can be made with accurate error rates. Further, the model shares information between different subpopulations in the estimation of average and conditional average multivariate treatment effects. To facilitate interpretation, multivariate logistic regression parameters are transformed to posterior success probabilities and differences between them. A numerical evaluation compared our framework to less comprehensive alternatives and highlighted the need to model the multilevel structure: Treatment comparisons based on the multilevel model had targeted Type I error rates, while single-level alternatives resulted in inflated Type I errors. Further, the multilevel model was more powerful than a single-level model when the number of clusters was higher. ...

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑