arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2211.09949cs.CLcs.LGcs.SDeess.AS

更小的总是更快的吗?压缩自监督语音Transformer的权衡

Is Smaller Always Faster? Tradeoffs in Compressing Self-Supervised Speech Transformers

Graduate Institute of Communication Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taiwan(台湾国立台湾大学通信工程研究所);University of California, Los Angeles, United States(美国加州大学洛杉矶分校);University of Washington, United States(美国华盛顿大学);University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom(英国爱丁堡大学)

Tzu-Quan Lin, Tsung-Huan Yang, Chun-Yao Chang, Kuang-Ming Chen, Tzu-hsun Feng, Hung-yi Lee, Hao Tang

AI总结:

本文研究了压缩自监督语音Transformer的权衡,评估了四种压缩方法并比较了几种最新技术,为实际部署提供指导。

摘要:

基于Transformer的自监督模型在语音处理中取得了显著的成功,但其庞大的规模和高的推理成本对实际部署构成了重大挑战。尽管已经提出了许多压缩技术,但不一致的评估指标使得难以比较它们的实际效果。在本工作中,我们对四种常见的压缩方法进行了全面研究,包括权重剪枝、头剪枝、低秩近似和知识蒸馏,应用于自监督语音Transformer。我们评估每种方法在三个关键指标下:参数数量、乘法累加操作和实时因子。结果表明,每种方法都有各自的优势。此外,我们还将最近的压缩技术置于同一框架下进行比较,包括DistilHuBERT、FitHuBERT、LightHuBERT、ARMHuBERT和STaRHuBERT,提供了部署中的实用指导。

英文摘要:

Transformer-based self-supervised models have achieved remarkable success in speech processing, but their large size and high inference cost present significant challenges for real-world deployment. While numerous compression techniques have been proposed, inconsistent evaluation metrics make it difficult to compare their practical effectiveness. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive study of four common compression methods, including weight pruning, head pruning, low-rank approximation, and knowledge distillation on self-supervised speech Transformers. We evaluate each method under three key metrics: parameter count, multiply-accumulate operations, and real-time factor. Results show that each method offers distinct advantages. In addition, we contextualize recent compression techniques, comparing DistilHuBERT, FitHuBERT, LightHuBERT, ARMHuBERT, and STaRHuBERT under the same framework, offering practical guidance on compression for deployment.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑