arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2211.08043math.OCcs.LG

Bregman邻近方法的收敛速率:局部几何 vs. 正则性 vs. 尖锐性

The rate of convergence of Bregman proximal methods: Local geometry vs. regularity vs. sharpness

Univ. Grenoble Alpes(格勒诺布尔大学);CNRS(法国国家科学研究中心);Inria(法国国家信息与自动化研究所);Grenoble INP(格勒诺布尔理工学院);Institut de Mathématiques de Toulouse(图卢兹数学研究所);Université de Toulouse(图卢兹大学);UPS(图卢兹第三大学);LIG(格勒诺布尔信息与信号处理实验室)

Waïss Azizian, Franck Iutzeler, Jérôme Malick, Panayotis Mertikopoulos

AI总结:

该研究分析Bregman邻近方法的最后迭代收敛速率与局部几何的关系,提出勒让德指数是关键影响因素,揭示了边界解的收敛速率二分性及线性约束下的更显著差异。

摘要:

我们研究了从镜像下降到镜像邻近算法及其乐观变体在内的Bregman邻近方法的最后迭代收敛速率,将其作为由定义该方法的邻近映射所诱导的局部几何的函数。为保证通用性,我们聚焦于带约束的非单调变分不等式的局部解,并证明给定方法的收敛速率与其相关的勒让德指数密切相关,该指数用于衡量基础Bregman函数(欧几里得型、熵型或其他类型)在解附近的增长速率。特别地,我们证明边界解在勒让德指数为零和非零的方法之间呈现出截然不同的收敛状态:前者以线性速率收敛,而后者通常以次线性速率收敛。这种二分现象在线性约束问题中更为显著:采用熵正则化的方法沿尖锐方向可实现线性收敛速率,而在欧几里得正则化下则可在有限步内收敛。

英文摘要:

We examine the last-iterate convergence rate of Bregman proximal methods - from mirror descent to mirror-prox and its optimistic variants - as a function of the local geometry induced by the prox-mapping defining the method. For generality, we focus on local solutions of constrained, non-monotone variational inequalities, and we show that the convergence rate of a given method depends sharply on its associated Legendre exponent, a notion that measures the growth rate of the underlying Bregman function (Euclidean, entropic, or other) near a solution. In particular, we show that boundary solutions exhibit a stark separation of regimes between methods with a zero and non-zero Legendre exponent: the former converge at a linear rate, while the latter converge, in general, sublinearly. This dichotomy becomes even more pronounced in linearly constrained problems where methods with entropic regularization achieve a linear convergence rate along sharp directions, compared to convergence in a finite number of steps under Euclidean regularization.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑