arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2211.07528astro-ph.HEgr-qc
收藏

偏心率还是自转进动?在引力波数据中区分次要效应

Eccentricity or spin precession? Distinguishing subdominant effects in gravitational-wave data

Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Cambridge(剑桥大学应用数学与理论物理系);School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University(蒙纳士大学物理与天文学院);OzGrav: The ARC Centre of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery(引力波发现ARC卓越中心);Dipartimento di Fisica “G. Occhialini”, Universitá degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca(米兰比可卡大学“G. Oc恰利尼”物理系);INFN, Sezione di Milano-Bicocca(意大利国家核物理研究所米兰比可卡分部);School of Physics and Astronomy & Institute for Gravitational Wave Astronomy, University of Birmingham(伯明翰大学物理与天文学院及引力波天文学研究所);Dipartimento di Fisica, “Sapienza” Università di Roma & Sezione INFN Roma1(罗马智慧大学物理系及意大利国家核物理研究所罗马一分部)

Isobel M. Romero-Shaw, Davide Gerosa, Nicholas Loutrel

AI总结:

研究通过模拟分析,探讨了引力波数据中偏心率与自转进动的区分条件,发现对于某些源类型,无法可靠区分两者。

摘要:

偏心率和自转进动是引力波天文学中的关键观测量,编码了关于致密双星形成的重要天文信息以及相对论双体问题的细节。然而,这两种效应在发出的信号中可能相互模仿,引发了关于其可区分性的疑问。由于目前无法同时推断出偏心率和自转进动的存在,当前最先进的分析假设数据中可能只存在其中一种效应。在这种情况下,什么条件是 confident 识别其中一种效应所必需的?我们通过模拟参数推断研究,在现实的LIGO/Virgo噪声中研究了与自转进动或偏心双黑洞并合事件一致的事件,并在假设其中一种效应可能起作用的情况下进行恢复。我们量化了偏心率和自转进动可区分性的程度随着可见轨道周期数的增加而增加,确认了信号必须足够长才能使这两种效应分离。阈值取决于注入源,倾角、偏心率和有效自旋起着关键作用。特别是对于类似于GW190521的注入源,我们发现无法自信地区分偏心率和自转进动。

英文摘要:

Eccentricity and spin precession are key observables in gravitational-wave astronomy, encoding precious information about the astrophysical formation of compact binaries together with fine details of the relativistic two-body problem. However, the two effects can mimic each other in the emitted signals, raising issues around their distinguishability. Since inferring the existence of both eccentricity and spin precession simultaneously is -- at present -- not possible, current state-of-the-art analyses assume that either one of the effects may be present in the data. In such a setup, what are the conditions required for a confident identification of either effect? We present simulated parameter inference studies in realistic LIGO/Virgo noise, studying events consistent with either spin precessing or eccentric binary black hole coalescences and recovering under the assumption that either of the two effects may be at play. We quantify how the distinguishability of eccentricity and spin precession increases with the number of visible orbital cycles, confirming that the signal must be sufficiently long for the two effects to be separable. The threshold depends on the injected source, with inclination, eccentricity, and effective spin playing crucial roles. In particular, for injections similar to GW190521, we find that it is impossible to confidently distinguish eccentricity from spin precession.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑