arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2210.16640eess.IVcs.CVeess.SPq-bio.QM

2D and 3D CT Radiomic Features Performance Comparison in Characterization of Gastric Cancer: A Multi-center Study

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院大学);Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院自动化研究所);Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology(华南理工大学医学院附属广州市第一人民医院);Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital(贵州省人民医院);Henan Cancer Hospital(河南省肿瘤医院);Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences(广东省人民医院、广东省医学科学院);Beihang University(北京航空航天大学)

Lingwei Meng, Di Dong, Xin Chen, Mengjie Fang, Rongpin Wang, Jing Li, Zaiyi Liu, Jie Tian

英文摘要:

Objective: Radiomics, an emerging tool for medical image analysis, is potential towards precisely characterizing gastric cancer (GC). Whether using one-slice 2D annotation or whole-volume 3D annotation remains a long-time debate, especially for heterogeneous GC. We comprehensively compared 2D and 3D radiomic features' representation and discrimination capacity regarding GC, via three tasks. Methods: Four-center 539 GC patients were retrospectively enrolled and divided into the training and validation cohorts. From 2D or 3D regions of interest (ROIs) annotated by radiologists, radiomic features were extracted respectively. Feature selection and model construction procedures were customed for each combination of two modalities (2D or 3D) and three tasks. Subsequently, six machine learning models (Model_2D^LNM, Model_3D^LNM; Model_2D^LVI, Model_3D^LVI; Model_2D^pT, Model_3D^pT) were derived and evaluated to reflect modalities' performances in characterizing GC. Furthermore, we performed an auxiliary experiment to assess modalities' performances when resampling spacing is different. Results: Regarding three tasks, the yielded areas under the curve (AUCs) were: Model_2D^LNM's 0.712 (95% confidence interval, 0.613-0.811), Model_3D^LNM's 0.680 (0.584-0.775); Model_2D^LVI's 0.677 (0.595-0.761), Model_3D^LVI's 0.615 (0.528-0.703); Model_2D^pT's 0.840 (0.779-0.901), Model_3D^pT's 0.813 (0.747-0.879). Moreover, the auxiliary experiment indicated that Models_2D are statistically more advantageous than Models3D with different resampling spacings. Conclusion: Models constructed with 2D radiomic features revealed comparable performances with those constructed with 3D features in characterizing GC. Significance: Our work indicated that time-saving 2D annotation would be the better choice in GC, and provided a related reference to further radiomics-based researches.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑