arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2210.08545math.PRcs.DMmath.HO
收藏

D/M/1队列:策略和控制

D/M/1 Queue: Policies and Control

Steven Finch

摘要:

均衡G/M/1-FIFO的等待时间是指数分布的,Smith(1953)首先证明了这一点。对于其他客户端排序策略,这种通用性是不可行的。假设到达间隔是恒定的。D/M/1-LIFO密度的符号是完全已知的; D/M/1-SIRO的数字是通过Burke(1967)的未发表的递归产生的。考虑两个成本的加权和,一个是让客户等待治疗,另一个是让服务器空闲。考虑到这一点,什么是最佳的到达间隔,这如何取决于政策的选择?

英文摘要:

Equilibrium G/M/1-FIFO waiting times are exponentially distributed, as first proved by Smith (1953). For other client-sorting policies, such generality is not feasible. Assume that interarrival times are constant. Symbolics for the D/M/1-LIFO density are completely known; numerics for D/M/1-SIRO arise via an unpublished recursion due to Burke (1967). Consider a weighted sum of two costs, one from keeping clients waiting for treatment and the other from having the server idle. With this in mind, what is the optimal interarrival time and how does this depend on the choice of policy?

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑