arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2210.07623quant-phnucl-ex
收藏

湮灭光子的纠缠

Entanglement of annihilation photons

Alexander Ivashkin, Dzhonrid Abdurashitov, Alexander Baranov, Fedor Guber, Sergey Morozov, Sultan Musin, Alexander Strizhak, Igor Tkachev

AI总结:

本研究通过康普顿偏振计实验直接比较了正负电子湮灭光子对在纠缠态与可分离态下的偏振关联,发现两者角分布和贝尔关联函数相同,质疑了贝尔定理的普适性。

摘要:

我们展示了一项关于正负电子在静止状态下湮灭产生的光子对量子纠缠的新实验研究结果。实验装置包括一套康普顿偏振计系统,用于测量纠缠态和退相干态下湮灭光子的康普顿散射。退相干态是通过在偏振计测量之前对初始光子之一进行预散射来制备的。我们首次直接比较了纠缠态和由此制备的可分离态下湮灭光子的偏振关联。结果表明,两种量子态下散射光子的角分布相同,这对量子纠缠正电子发射断层成像来说是一个意外发现。此外,贝尔不等式中的关联函数在纠缠态和可分离态下也相同。由此可知,尽管在一系列实验中进行了大量测量,仍然没有实验证据证明湮灭光子的纠缠。这些结果与最近关于纠缠态和特定混合可分离量子态具有相同康普顿散射截面的理论预测一致,并对贝尔定理在检验量子理论中纠缠和非局域性方面的普适性提出了质疑。

英文摘要:

We present the results of a new experimental study of the quantum entanglement of photon pairs produced in positron-electron annihilation at rest. The experimental setup includes a system of Compton polarimeters to measure the Compton scattering of annihilation photons in entangled and decoherent states. Decoherent states are prepared by pre-scattering of one of the initial photons prior to measurements in polarimeters. For the first time, a direct comparison of the polarization correlations of annihilation photons in the entangled and thus prepared separable states has been carried out. The angular distributions of scattered photons turned out to be the same in both quantum states, which is an unexpected discovery for the quantum-entangled positron emission tomography. Moreover, the correlation function in the Bell's inequality is also the same for entangled and separable states. It follows that, despite numerous measurements in a series of experiments, there is still no experimental proof of the entanglement of annihilation photons. These results are in line with recent theoretical predictions of an identical Compton scattering cross-section for entangled and specific mixed separable quantum states and cast doubt on the universality of the Bell's theorem for testing the entanglement and nonlocality in quantum theory.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑