arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2210.07544cs.CLcs.IR

Legal Case Document Summarization: Extractive and Abstractive Methods and their Evaluation

Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur(印度理工学院克勒格布尔分校);Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata(印度科学教育与研究所加尔各答分校)

Abhay Shukla, Paheli Bhattacharya, Soham Poddar, Rajdeep Mukherjee, Kripabandhu Ghosh, Pawan Goyal, Saptarshi Ghosh

英文摘要:

Summarization of legal case judgement documents is a challenging problem in Legal NLP. However, not much analyses exist on how different families of summarization models (e.g., extractive vs. abstractive) perform when applied to legal case documents. This question is particularly important since many recent transformer-based abstractive summarization models have restrictions on the number of input tokens, and legal documents are known to be very long. Also, it is an open question on how best to evaluate legal case document summarization systems. In this paper, we carry out extensive experiments with several extractive and abstractive summarization methods (both supervised and unsupervised) over three legal summarization datasets that we have developed. Our analyses, that includes evaluation by law practitioners, lead to several interesting insights on legal summarization in specific and long document summarization in general.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑